LCRO 77/2015 EAB v FBC (7 July 2017) [pdf, 94 KB]
...Committee’s orders did not go far enough. Mr EAB wants answers from Mr FBC, as well as the maximum available in penalties and compensation, and a refund of at least half of Mr FBC’s fees. He considers Mr FBC’s name should be published for the protection of the public. Review Hearing [18] Both parties attended a review hearing by telephone on 6 December 2016. Mr EAB was asked to provide evidence that he was GCD’s personal representative. After the review hearing Mr EAB...