Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v Withers [2013] NZLCDT 54 [pdf, 242 KB]
...and dishonesty, and that he had little awareness of his professional obligations. [7] All of these matters, the Committee said, meant that the only appropriate penalty was an order striking Mr Withers’ name from the roll, to ensure public protection and to demonstrate a proper response to his wrongdoing. Position of Mr Withers [8] For Mr Withers, it was submitted that striking off was not the appropriate penalty in this case. The Tribunal was asked to balance factors w...