Search Results

1. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...Objective 2 Objective 2 measures progress as the short-term numeric water quality values in Table 3.11-1 being “met” no later than 10 Amend Objective 2 as follows: Progress is made over the life of this Plan towards the restoration and protection of the health and Support in part Oppose in part Federated Farmers is interested in this appeal point so as to ensure that any outcomes are consistent with the years after PC1 is made operative. Policy 8(a) seeks collect...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...defined role within the District. This policy is based on a community expectation that the management of resources within distinctive environments is necessary even at this scale to provide for the wellbeing, health and safety of the community, and to protect and enhance the natural and physical resources. As a result of its research and community consultation the Council considers it is possible to identify areas of different amenity values, environmental qualities, form and fun...

3. PC8 Urban Common Bundle - Volume 2 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENT for Freshwater Management 2014 Updated August 2017 to incorporate amendments from the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Amendment Order 2017 CB0465 2 Contents Preamble 4 Review 6 Title

4. Recommendations recap - issue 14 [pdf, 891 KB]

   ...https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/national-sudi-prevention-programme-launched 22 devices such as wahakura or pēpipods to families identified as needing them during the baby’s first year of life. A range of other evidence-based risk and protective factors will be incorporated into the national prevention programme. These include encouraging immunisation, breastfeeding, and sleeping baby on their back. As part of this investment, in 2017, a further $2 million was put into...

5. Gibbs v Te Runanga o Ngati Tama - Part Lot 2 and Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK4/792 (2011) 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) [pdf, 370 KB]

   GIBBS V TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA MLC 274 Aotea MB 47 [26 October 2011] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) A20040005718 A20070011279 UNDER Section 338(2), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 2 & Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK 4/792 BETWEEN RUSSELL GIBBS AND PARANI GIBBS Applicants AND TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA First Respondent AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCI

6. [2015] NZEmpC 168 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency interlocutory [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...defendant. 14 The defendant here is facing the looming prospect of expensive and extensive litigation (up to 10 days of hearing time), against the backdrop of significant legal costs already incurred. The reality is that it currently has no protection against ballooning costs which it has limited (if any) prospects of recouping. [18] Having weighed the competing considerations I am not persuaded that it is appropriate to exercise my discretion to make an order for security for c...

7. AX v ZM LCRO 244/2012 (23 April 2014) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...provide him with the material on the tapes. She says that by refusing to complete his retainer he favoured his employer’s interests over hers, thereby breaching his duty to act in her best interests. She is also concerned that Mr ZM failed to protect her confidential information, and refused to provide her with other relevant information. [13] Ms AX is also critical of the Standards Committee in two particular respects. She says the Committee should have directed her and Mr Z...

8. Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 105 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...complaint), the Tribunal has prevented Ms Tangilanu from reapplying for a licence for two years. Those decisions explain why I do not consider rehabilitation is realistic. Those sanctions relating to Ms Tangilanu’s ability to hold a licence address the protection of the public and the desirability of rehabilitation. In relation to the other sanctions imposed, the orders excluding Ms Tangilanu from practising are taken into account as part of the matrix of penalties. [12] The complaina...

9. LCRO 65/2017 IR v NW and EN (18 April 2019) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...normally of itself impose a duty of care on one solicitor to the client of the other. Normally the relationship is not sufficiently proximate. Each solicitor is entitled to expect that the other party will look to his own solicitor for advice and protection. 3 Hence, Mr EN’s duty is to Mr NW and he has no duty to protect and promote the interests of Mr IR. Mr EN’s duty to Mr NW includes acting on his client’s instructions and it is in the context of those instructions that...

10. TQ v ON [2022] NZDT 242 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...deteriorated and worn away. I note that the WOF checksheet dated 5 May 2022 states that the centre driver’s shaft hanger was broken. (d) There was no mention during the sale of the Falcon being sold ‘as is where is’ and, in any event, that does not protect a respondent against a misrepresentation. The general rule of Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware) applies to a private sale of goods, however, that rule does not apply if there is a misrepresentation to which s35(1)(a) of the...