Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 29 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...No party seeks an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT [39] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: a. maintain a relationship of confidence and trust with the client and provide objective advice … c. facilitate the provision of interpreters and translat...

2. [2024] NZIACDT 30 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...No party seeks an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT [35] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: a. maintain a relationship of confidence and trust with the client and provide objective advice … c. facilitate the provision of interpreters and translat...

3. [2024] NZIACDT 25 - EM v Ma (25 October 2024) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...[35] No party seeks an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT [36] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: … 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 9 At [97], [101]–[102] a...

4. BE v W Ltd & KN [2024] NZDT 885 (15 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...he had a fiduciary duty to his client, IL. KN said that was his primary duty. I realise there is a difficulty for a real estate sales person negotiating the competing duties to the client and to potential purchasers. However, the FTA is consumer protection legislation. In this case, IL has had the benefit of KN silence in respect of the encroachment, to BE’s disadvantage. BE is entitled to the protection of the FTA. 21. I have also taken into account the respondents’ submission...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 33 - KM v Jiang (16 June 2025) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...8. Failed to have proper file management. [19] In mitigation, Mr Jiang pointed out: 1. There was no financial loss or adverse immigration outcome. The outcome would have been similar if the misconduct had not happened. 2. His breaches were careless, not deliberate. 3. His misconduct was technical and administrative, in that there was no dishonesty or negligence. 4. He responded to the Authority’s enquiries with the utmost good faith and admitted misconduct. 5. This was the...

6. TC & QC v FT & TT [2025] NZDT 71 (6 March 2025) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...the reasons noted above, I have made a finding that there was no misrepresentation made by FT and RT to QC under s35(1)(a) of the CCLA. That is the only basis on which a private purchaser can claim damages from a private seller, because the consumer protections provided by the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 do not apply to private sales of goods. (d) I am satisfied that the [vehicle] does not need to be fixed immediately and is driveable as is (for the reasons noted above). While I acknow...

7. Kauikia-Stevens v Trustees of the Rangitatau 1D5A1 Block (2014) 318 Aotea MB 217 (318 AOT 217) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...to such a degree as is evident from the material before the Court. [59] The hostility and rancour between the principal parties continues to distract the trustees from their obligations to the beneficiaries. In one sense, when the evidence is carefully considered, the present situation could unflatteringly be characterised as an extreme case of bad neighbours. The ongoing conflict between the applicant and his first cousin Scott Wirihana Tawake over quite mundane matters – acc...

8. Issues with access to justice in the Environment Court of New Zealand [pdf, 477 KB]

   ...having entered a state of considerable flux. In this paper, we do not comment on government policy and the formulating of substantive laws, as it is not our place as judges to do so. It can, however, fall within our responsibilities as judges to make careful public observa- tions about matters of court process and access to justice. This is what we set out to do in this paper, in the context of historic, current, and possible future legislative scenarios. Challenges facing environment courts...

9. PR v HG 69/2016 LCRO [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...reference to the deceit cause of action and the evidence to support it. [100] Reference is also made to the private investigator and his enquiries aimed at verifying the financial position of Mr HG and related entities. Counsel contends that the protections provided by rule 8.8 do not apply in the circumstances of Mr HG’s complaint. [101] Counsel also addressed the “numerous additional assertions and allegations”50 made by Mr HG in the course of his dealings with Ms PR, and...

10. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

    ...it may show a disjoined vinculum over titles on either side of the roadway. Conversely, if it is shown as running over existing titles as per a right of way or has a joined vinculum running through it, then it is not a separate freehold title. Care should be taken in relying on sketch plans as they do not always follow the Court’s minute and are not necessarily approved by a Judge. Care should also be taken in relying on survey plans that have not been approved by the Court....