Search Results

1. [2025] NZREADT 25 – ZA v REAA 2204 & DU (14 July 2025) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...tenant, which had included an adjoining space.22 She made the error in listing the property on the website, an error which then found its way into the lease. [61] This might be regarded as careless. It is arguable the licensee should have carefully checked such a critical fact, particularly before inserting it into the lease. The failure to do so might establish a lack of skill, care and diligence, in breach of r 5.1. This is possibly the additional element elevating the errone...

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 10/07 X v Auckland DHB [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...counsel on a compact disk. The letter continued: ADHB is not willing to advise how it became aware of the images. It does not consider the way in which the matter came to ADHB’s attention to be relevant. Furthermore, ADHB has obligations to protect staff from bullying, intimidation and harassment. In the event that you consider the way in which the information came to ADHB’s attention to be material, we would be grateful if you would advise us and we will endeavour t...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 029 Cable Bay Wines Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...land unit". Policy 2 limits the range of non-rural and non­ residential activities to avoid adverse effects on landscape and the general amenity of the area. Policy 4 emphasises the need for buildings to be small scale as a further means of protecting natural character and landscape values within the land unit. [93] We have examined the effects of extensive use of the lawn area for functions, informal dining, drinking and associated activities. The evidence supports a conclus...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 39 ALA v ITE [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...is one that must be approached in a careful and principled fashion; and the relevant principles must be considered on a case by case basis. [61] I begin my consideration of this issue by describing those principles. [62] With regard to the protection of confidential information, the correct approach as to how public interest factors should be assessed was confirmed in the speech of Lord Goff in Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2): 23 … [A]lthough the basis of...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry report - prepublication version [pdf, 905 KB]

   T h e N g ā p u h i M a N d a T e i N q u i r y r e p o r T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 5 W a i 2 4 9 0 T h e N

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry report [pdf, 905 KB]

   T h e N g ā p u h i M a N d a T e i N q u i r y r e p o r T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 5 W a i 2 4 9 0 T h e N

7. Joint Application to Make a New Parenting Order by Consent [pdf, 603 KB]

   PAGE 1Joint Application to Make a New Parenting Order by ConsentV1 July 2019 G U ID E The purpose of this form Use this form if you and all other ‘interested parties’ (any parent, guardian, person named on an existing Order or has care and/or contact responsibilities of the child(ren)) have reached agreement about arrangements for day to day care and/or contact of the child(ren) and you want the court to make a Parenting Order by consent. Who should fill in this form? This form must b...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 058 Barnhill Corporate Trustee v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 995 KB]

   ...capacity ratings? (e) should an 80 ha minimum lot size regime remain for all areas outside the Precinct rated to have Very Low, Low and Moderate-Low capacity or just LCU 1 and LCU 20? (f) do QLDC’s Pol 24.2.1.1 and other policies adequately protect against cumulative landscape character degradation? (g) how should new Pols 24.2.1.1A and 24.2.1.1B be framed for remaining WBRAZ areas? (h) should Pols 24.2.1.11 and 24.2.1.14 apply to areas rated with Moderate-High or High lan...

9. Proactive-release-Better-Outcomes-for-Victims-Work-Programme_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...documents have been proactive ly released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4 . No. Document Comments 1 Better Outcomes for Victims: Work Released with some information withheld under Programme section 9(2)(f)(iv) of the OIA to protect the Cabinet paper confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of Office of the Minister of Justice the Crown and officials and section 9(2)(g)(1) to Lodged: 23 March 2023 maintain free and frank expression of opinion. 1a Better Out...

10. LCRO 72/2020 ZW v CB (29 September 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...[X] to take no further action in respect of his complaint concerning the conduct of the respondent, Mr CB. Background [2] Mr ZW’s house was undergoing renovations. The roof was removed. The house was enclosed with shrink wrap to provide protection against the elements. The house was hit by a storm. The shrink wrap failed and, as a consequence, both the house and its contents suffered damage. [3] The cost of the water damage was estimated to exceed $100,000. 2 [4] The...