Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 93 CG v Calendar Girls NZ Ltd [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...and inspection of the documents that are to be disclosed. [80] There has been concern expressed in the affidavits of the plaintiffs about the potential breach of privacy and confidentiality if an order for disclosure is made. [81] There are protections in reg 51 of the Regulations that apply. The integrity and confidentiality of any documents disclosed must be always maintained, and the person obtaining disclosure must use the documents and their contents for the purposes of the...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 022 Waikato Regional Council v Waikato District Council [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   Waikato Regional Council v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 022 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-AKL-000073) AMBURY PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000081) NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY - WAKA KOTAHI (ENV-2021-AKL-000086) Appellants AND WAIKATO DI

3. LCRO 21/2019 IV v EC and HL (21 December 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...concludes Ms EC acted in accordance with her professional obligations in respect of the EPOAs. The sale and purchase of the properties [23] The Committee’s decision records the requirements of rr 6.1, 6.1.1, and 6.2 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules,9 which relate to a lawyer (or a firm) acting for both parties on a matter. The Committee said:10 Ms EC and Mr HL both say an information barrier was established, with different members of the firm acting for Mr IV and the purcha...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 64 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...provide an inquiry option for remain­ ing historical claims, develop a new inquiry programme for hearing kau­ papa or contemporary claims, and hear urgent claims and applications for remedies. This increasingly diverse inquiry programme will require careful deploy­ ment of the Tribunal’s human and finan­ cial resources. The Tribunal remains committed to completing inquiries into historical claims, contributing to the effort being devoted to negoti­ ating Treaty settlements nation...

5. 2020-12-07 Statement of Evidence of Tom de Pelsemaeker on behalf of the ORC - Appendix A.pdf [pdf, 378 KB]

   1 447585.29#4972508v3 APPENDIX A PLANNING PROVISIONS REFERRED TO IN EVIDENCE - INDEX DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER IN THIS ATTACHMENT Regional Plan: Water for Otago Chapter 6: Water Quantity Objective 6.3.1 5 Objective 6.3.2 5 Policy 6.4.0A 5 Policy 6.4.0C 6 Policy 6.4.1 6 Policy 6.4.1A 7 Policy 6.4.2 9 Policy 6.4.2A 11 Policy 6.4.2AA 12 Policy 6.4.5 12 Policy 6.4.8 14 Policy 6.4.9 14 Policy 6.4.10 15 Policy 6.4.10A2 16 Policy 6.4.10A4 16 P

6. [2023] NZEnvC 011 Airbnb Australia PTY Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...network. Activity Sensitive To Aircraft Noise (ASAN) / Activity Sensitive to Road Noise Means any residential activity, visitor accommodation activity, residential visitor accommodation activity, homestay activity, community activity and day care facility activity as defined in this District Plan including all outdoor spaces associated with any education activity, but excludes activity in police stations, fire stations, courthouses, probation and detention centres, government and lo...

7. [2016] NZEnvC 051 Craddock Farms Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...farming of poultry on site that does not comply with Rule 4.5.116, Rule 4.5.117 or Rule 4.5.119 is a discretionary activity. Auckland Council Regional Plan: Sediment Control • Rule 5.4.2.1 provides for earthworks outside of a Sediment Control Protection Area, on an area between 1 and 5 hectares where the land has a slope ofless than 15 degrees as a controlled activity. Auckland Council District Plan: Franklin Section 4 • Rule 23A.1.3.5 provides for Intensive Farming as a...

8. Privacy-Act-2020-Indirect-notification-obligation-April-2023-Cabinet-paper_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...greater compliance obligations. However, this risk needs to be 4 See the High Court judicial review proceedings in Te Pou Matakana vs Attorney-General [2021] NZHC 3319 [6 December 2021]. I N C O N F I D E N C E 9 I N C O N F I D E N C E carefully monitored and minimised as much as possible by ensuring agencies have appropriate guidance. Population implications Women, children and disabled people 50. Information sharing under other legislative regimes which protect th...

9. LCRO 182/2017 TP v ZN (14 September 2020) [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...document itself prominently refers to the arrangement between [Firm B] and Mrs ZN as being a “Partnership [Programme]”. 3 [15] Several days after he lodged the proceedings, Mr TP provided Mrs ZN with what is generally known as client care information, spread across three different documents. This included information about Mr TP’s fees. I discuss that material in more detail later in my decision. [16] Between 2014 and 2016 there were unsuccessful attempts by Mrs ZN and...

10. Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: Extending the duration limit of Police safety orders [pdf, 667 KB]

    ...address the behaviour of the person subject to the PSO (the bound person) by removing them from the scene for up to five days • people at risk (victims) with time and space to seek support and consider any long-term safety arrangements (e.g. protection orders). The time it takes for victims to put in place safety arrangements following a family violence incident can exceed the duration limit of PSOs. The lack of safety arrangements following a PSO expiring puts victims at greater...