Hinckley v Macduff LCRO 169 / 2009 (28 January 2010) [pdf, 158 KB]
...with Ms Macduff and that in fact he intended to deal in the property in a way which was inconsistent with the rights of his brothers under the trust and the deed of 29 March 2006. This would be impossible under the agreement of 25 June 2009 which protected the trust funds by requiring them to be placed in a joint trust bank account requiring the signature of all three brothers as trustees. [27] I have reviewed the correspondence in the matter and heard from both parties. I consider t...