Search Results

1. [2020] NZIACDT 35 - NZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin (7 August 2020) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...logo and footer on a course content document he created to give it the appearance of an official school document and then filed it with NZQA, knowing it to be false, in breach of cl 1 in relation to honesty, professionalism and acting with due care; or (3) alternatively, placed a school logo and footer on a course content document he created to give it the appearance of an official school document and then filed it with NZQA, knowing it to be false, thereby deliberately or negligent...

2. LCRO 19/2024 MT v DB (31 January 2025) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...decision. [43] Pursuant to s 206(4) of the Act, a Review Officer may direct such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [44] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be...

3. LCRO 168/2023 KM v ZT (30 April 2025) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...that he considered there was sufficient information available on the Standards Committee file to enable the review to proceed on the papers. [35] I agree with that decision. The issue on review is narrowly focused. [36] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that necessit...

4. [2025] NZLCDT 26 Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Jindal (8 May 2025) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...aggravating in relation to the practitioner himself. [4] Where possible we weigh the present matter against other cases where similar conduct has been considered. [5] All of the above is directed and framed by the purposes of the legislation to protect the public and to maintain the confidence of the public in the legal profession. [6] The various purposes of penalty imposition in disciplinary proceedings are aimed towards this end. In this case, relevant principles to be appli...

5. Appellate judgments 2016

   ...any arguable point of sufficient importance, Employment Court considered and applied well-established principles in awarding increased and indemnity costs. [2016] NZCA 369 Director-General of Health v Lowe Homeworker" (s 5) L, who undertook support care under a Government programme, the Carer Support Scheme (providing respite to persons providing unpaid full time care to a person with a disability) CA overturning a full EC decision that L was a homeworker and so deemed to be an employee to wh...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

6. CAC301 v Murphy [2015] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...enter the property until some more significant testing had been done. The indicative test told him that there was methamphetamine present at the property and he immediately noticed a very strong smell of that when entering it. He was dressed in full protective clothing comprising a suit, a mask, and breathing apparatus. He observed that whether or not there might be an aroma from methamphetamine could be related to whether the property had been shut up or ventilated prior to entry. [3...

7. Peni v Pahi — Tiroa E Block and Te Hape B Block (2010) 1 Waikato Maniapoto MB 25 (1 WMN 25) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...have to seek removal of the trustee by the Court. The fact that a clause in the trust order allows a trustee to be employed is not to say that the employment of a trustee in particular circumstances is best practice. The trustees need to think carefully each time they have to involve this clause. The clause is commonly inserted to allow payment of professional trustees such as lawyers and accountants whose knowledge of the trust’s affairs means the legal and accounting affairs...

8. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 12 (4 March 2019) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...recorded on the application form. When he received confirmation that the application had been completed as dictated by him, he reviewed the documents and lodged the application. It is therefore not correct to suggest that he did not exercise due care and diligence. 10 Statutory Declaration of complainant, 28 July 2014, at 3 of translation. 11 At 1, 2 & 3 of translation. 11 [54] Mr Sun accepts he did not have direct contact with...

9. Van Wey Lovatt v Health New Zealand (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...compensation for that alleged breach. [46] There is a distinction between the matters which are addressed by each of Rules 5 and 8. Rule 5 relates to the storage and security of health information. It requires an agency to ensure that information is protected by such security safeguards as are reasonable in the circumstances to take against access, use, modification or disclosure, except with the authority of the agency. [47] Rule 8 relates to a requirement to ensure that the accu...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 143 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 857 KB]

    ...(b) the formation of an internal private roading network and associated stormwater management infrastructure; (c) the creation of a 20m wide esplanade reserve and strip; (d) the provision of approximately 39ha of environmental benefit through the protection and enhancement of stream and riparian margins and bush habitats (to be protected for perpetuity by way of private land covenants and consent notice conditions); and (e) the provision of approximately 16ha of amenity enhancement and...