5318 items matching your search terms
H v A Limited NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 [13 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 ARC 3/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Limited Defendant Hearing: 24 February 2014 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Appearances: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge Christina Inglis Judge M E Perkins RE Harrison QC
...oppression, and the creator of greater evils than those they are appointed to cure. There is therefore a serious responsibility on the Court – a duty to itself, to the rest of the profession, to its suitors, and to the whole of the community to be careful not to accredit any person as worthy of public confidence who cannot satisfactorily establish his right to that credential. It is not a question of what he has suffered in the past, it is a question of his worthiness and reli...
H v A Limited NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 [13 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 ARC 3/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Limited Defendant Hearing: 24 February 2014 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Appearances: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge Christina Inglis Judge M E Perkins RE Harrison QC
CLAIM FILE NO: 00134 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PHILLIP LIONEL KELLEWAY and PRITTY SITA KELLEWAY Claimants AND MANU INSAR First respondent AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL Second respondent AND CHRISTINE TENNENT Third respondent HEARING: 27 & 28 August 2003 COUNSEL for the Claimants: D Tui COUNSEL for the Second Respondent: S Jameson and D Hean
Contents Data Tables Contents i About the data tables About the survey, interpreting statistics, symbol notation and links for further information. ii Terms and definitions Selected terms and definitions. Public perceptions and security measures 34 Perceptions of neighbourhood crime and disorder – estimates Perceptions of types of neighbourhood crime problems, social disorder, changes in neighbourhood crime levels, 2006, 2009 and 2014. 34a Perceptions
...depend exclusively on the claimant’s word is to be avoided. If difficulties were to arise in this regard, they could no doubt be overcome by allowing the witness to make a submission or give evidence wholly or partially in camera, or under the protection of an undertaking that no use would be made of the statements outside the proceedings in which they were given. This possibility is envisaged by s 52(4)(a). [34] I have omitted the numerous footnote references in the foregoing p...
...were unable to be fulfilled. If that were the 10 case, his subsequent conduct has compounded the potential problems that may arise from this. [52] Mrs LS asserts that Mr TD has breached rules 2, 7, 11, and 11.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules.18 [53] Rule 7 provides: I am not sure that rule 2 is applicable, but I agree that rules 7, 11 and 11.1 are. I also consider that rule 10 is applicable. Disclosure and communication of information to clients 7 A lawyer...
...subject land was one security item in a list, you know. Mr Takarangl: Okay. Mr Nash tells me, Sir, that that was a nominee company loan that was registered against this title. It's in the historical search Sir. I actually spotted that and was careful to make sure that that mortgage had been discharged in an earlier title. Court: I see. So in essence what you're saying is as far as you are aware this wasn't a loan from a bank. Mr Takarangi: No it wasn't. Mr Jeremy...
...as the price and the date when they would be required to pay on the settlement date. That last question in turn was tied up with the question of when titles were likely to issue. [25] It was the obligation of the licensee to provide reasonably careful and honest advice on these matters at the point where the parties signed the agreement. The question is whether Mr He breached that obligation. 5 BD 118 [26] It would have been o...
...attributed to the Commission enabled it to act, the New Zealand Government continued to think that it was preferable for practical reasons to keep to the complaints and appeal procedures set out in the Immigration Act. As a safeguard, victims enjoyed the protection of the Bill of Rights 1990 or could lodge complaints against any discriminatory conduct on the part of immigration officials. The Human Rights Commission also retained its ability to inquire into any law, practice or case relat...