5318 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 54 Reference No. HRRT 012/2012 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN GORDON HENRY HOLMES PLAINTIFF AND HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GH Holmes in person Ms CP Paterson for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 17, 18, 19 and 20 March 2014 DATE OF LAST SUBMI
...housing at a range of densities; - Provision for a local-scale commercial centre; - Access to quality public open space; - Safe and efficient walking and cycling options; - Design that reflects Muaūpoko cultural values and local history and identity; - Protection of culturally significant sites; - Environmentally sensitive design; 6A OBJECTIVES/POLICIES: TARA-IKA MULTI-ZONE PRECINCT Horowhenua District Plan 4 - Within the Arapaepae Road Special Treatment Overlay, development that is app...
...focused on understanding links between maternity and early parenting support services and identifying who uses these services and who may be missing out. 15. Examples of results so far include a Maternity and “WellChild” needs assessment and care planning tool for early intervention. This tool has been in use in Porirua and Waikato since January 2011, and will ensure that needs are more consistently identified and referred to the appropriate places. 16. The inter-agency group ha...
...purpose and give rise to different considerations than civil proceedings taken to obtain financial remedies. We agree that principles relating to issue estoppel must not be applied too rigidly where that would have the effect of undermining the consumer protection purpose of the disciplinary regime contained in the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. However, we accept that issue estoppel principles are relevant to the exercise by a Committee (or to us on appeal) of the discretion to take no fu...
...phone Legal Aid Provider Services at the Ministry of Justice national office on 04 918 8800 or email legalaidprovider@justice.govt.nz Sending in your application Please email this form and any attachments (such as your practising certificate, client care letter or letter of engagement) to legalaidprovider@justice.govt.nz with ‘Limited approval – Provider’ in the subject line. If you intend to print this form out for filling in or signing, please scan and email a pdf back to us. S...
...defect before disclosing such to others and, if the client does not agree to this disclosure, the licensee is to cease to act pursuant to Rule 10.8. [26] Mr Rea submits that, furthermore, it would be contrary to the purpose of Rule 10.7, which is the protection of customers, for disclosure of an adverse methamphetamine test to be delayed pending receipt of confirmation of such disclosure from a vendor. He noted that Mr N Powell of Forensic & Industrial Science Ltd gave evidence that...
...That advice may have been provided forcefully. It may also be the case that Client S’s son, being in custody, felt pressured to accept the proposal, as it appeared the only way to get out of custody more or less immediately. [33] I have read carefully Client S’s son’s account of this series of events which he wrote in support of the Law Society complaint and is dated 10 October 2008. I place considerable weight on it. While he maintains his innocence in that letter and indica...
...Concerning the disparaging remarks issue the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed. Orders [1] In giving consideration as to whether it is appropriate to order a penalty, it is to be noted that the function of the disciplinary process is protective, not punitive.40 In these particular circumstances, other than the public interest in lawyers maintaining professional standards and ensuring compliance with the rules, no broader issues of consumer protection or public welfa...
...context of the breakdown of the employment relationship between Mrs CA and Mr BE’s client; 4 (d) Mr BE’s language and assertions were undoubtedly a reflection of the state of affairs between the parties; (e) Ms C’s instructions were protected by legal privilege and the Committee cannot go behind that to assess them; and (f) no other ancillary issues raised by Mrs CA raised professional conduct issues. Application for review [14] Mrs CA filed an application for review...
...application.14 Again, it is necessary to understand the facts of each case to understand the extent to which they assist in deciding the matters raised in the context of these proceedings. The first is CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, which concerned whether the Immigration Assessment Authority’s decision was invalid due to apprehended bias. The information provided to the Authority included a large amount of material which was irrelevant and prejudicial,...