[2025] NZEmpC 91 LDJ v EZC [pdf, 280 KB]
...may receive”. [32] The second and third features are relevant to whether a party is able to give “sufficient instructions” for the purposes of r 4.29. [33] Further, r 13.3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 states that: 12 Corbett, above n 11, at [50]. 13 Dalle-Molle (by his next friend Public Trustee) v Manos [2004] SASC 102, (2004) 88 SASR 193; see also Erwood v Maxted [2008] NZCA 139 at [139]. 14 Dalle-Molle, above n...