Search Results

1. LCRO 139/2020 MX v RJ and DJ (30 September 2021) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...funds may have been required for immediate release, can be reasonably criticised to the degree that the criticism would provide reasonable grounds for establishing a breach meriting of a disciplinary response. [126] No broader issues of consumer protection or public welfare have been raised by this issue. [127] I see no grounds which could persuade me to depart from the Committee’s decision. 15 CW v XB LCRO 213/2010 at [16]. 21 Anonymised publication [128] Pursuant...

2. BORA - Abortion Legislation Bill: Crown Law's advice [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...Committee’s recent General comment No 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life. In that General comment the Committee does not refer to any right to life for a foetus, focusing instead on protecting women and girls from unsafe abortions.13 14. The above authorities and our analysis point to the conclusion that a foetus does not enjoy the right not to be deprived of life under s 8 of the Bill of Rights Act. Accordingly...

3. Milligan v Robert Brown Developments Ltd [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...CLAIMANT’S DWELLING 24 The liability of the Second respondent, Stewart Ross 24 The liability of the Third respondent, Eastwood 27 The liability of the Fourth respondent, the Council 29 Did the council exercise the requisite standard of care when performing its functions, duties, and obligations under the building Act 1991 32 COSTS 39 CONCLUSION AND ORDERS 40 STATEMENT OF CONSEQUENCES 41 3 INTRODUCTION [1] This is a claim concern...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 179 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC r=J-q of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under s 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED ('PANUKU') (ENV-2018-AKL-0

5. Waitangi Tribunal Part 1 Report on stage 1 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   H e W H a k a p u t a n g a m e t e t i r i t i t H e D e c l a r a t i o n a n D t H e t r e a t y He Whakaputanga me te Tiriti The Declaration and the Treaty Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 1 0 4 0 The Report on Stage 1 of the

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000274 Rockfield Trust v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...IS> IS> IS> Tamaki Drive Scenic Way llSlSl.SlSl. Interchange Control Areas .,f,./v\tXv Pedestrian Malls ITIIIIIIl Footways Ser La Service Lanes Local Roads ... , :.: :::,:",: Collector Roads L!:......- District Arterial Roads Protection of Sunlight Admission i~;':~:·:f(.*':·:x Regional Arterial Roads Control to Broadway ___ _ Building Line Re~lrictions j:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:l:j:j:j:j:j~ Strategic Routes ~ Vehicular Access Restrictions _ •• - Cent...

7. Evaluation of Manukau Family Violence Court [pdf, 767 KB]

   The Manukau Family Violence Court: An Evaluation of the Family Violence Court Process The Manukau Family Violence Court: An Evaluation of the Family Violence Court Process Trish Knaggs Felicity Leahy Nataliya Soboleva Research Evaluation & Modelling August 2008 Published August 2008 Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand www.justice.govt.n

8. Kelleway v Insar [pdf, 283 KB]

   CLAIM FILE NO: 00134 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PHILLIP LIONEL KELLEWAY and PRITTY SITA KELLEWAY Claimants AND MANU INSAR First respondent AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL Second respondent AND CHRISTINE TENNENT Third respondent HEARING: 27 & 28 August 2003 COUNSEL for the Claimants: D Tui COUNSEL for the Second Respondent: S Jameson and D Hean

9. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Limited [pdf, 263 KB]

   H v A Limited NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 [13 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 92 ARC 3/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Limited Defendant Hearing: 24 February 2014 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Appearances: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge Christina Inglis Judge M E Perkins RE Harrison QC

10. Guest v New Zealand Law Society [2009] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 390 KB]

    ...oppression, and the creator of greater evils than those they are appointed to cure. There is therefore a serious responsibility on the Court – a duty to itself, to the rest of the profession, to its suitors, and to the whole of the community to be careful not to accredit any person as worthy of public confidence who cannot satisfactorily establish his right to that credential. It is not a question of what he has suffered in the past, it is a question of his worthiness and reli...