Search Results

1. McNicholl v CAC416 & O'Loughlin [2019] NZREADT 32 - Penalty (2 August 2019) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012, and fell short of the standard that a reasonable member of the public is entitled to expect from a reasonably competent licensee.4 Sentencing principles [11] The principal purpose of the Act is to “promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work.”5 The Act achieves these purposes by regulating agents, branch man...

2. Proactive release - COVID 19 Response Courts Safety Legislation Bill [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...6.10 provide a verdict would not be affected because a person was deferred or excused from jury service, or served on a jury, because of steps taken pursuant to the new powers in paragraphs 6.1 – 6.8; Clarify the relationship between open justice protections and health and safety measures through the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 7 agreed to clarify that the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 relating to public and media access to criminal proceedings do not affect the ability...

3. LCRO 47/2024 OZ v HD (22 November 2024) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...respondent submitted a statement about the matter supported by a copy of a file note made by the supervising accountant the day after the inspection took place recording her experience of the document inspection process. [44] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that necessit...

4. LCRO 49/2022 & 93/2022 WU v MQ obo CT (25 August 2022) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...CT’s will and the power of appointment does not vest in Mr WU alone. Elsewhere53 Mr MQ/Mr CT assert that what Mr CT wanted was for Mr MQ to be the executor of his estate. [75] The difference is subtle, but important, and it would have taken some careful explanation to ensure Mr CT comprehended the difference. It would also raise the level of understanding required of Mr CT. [76] In considering this question, it is perhaps of some relevance, that the focus of the complaints has...

5. Status hearings evaluation: New Zealand study of pre-trial hearings in criminal cases [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...should not go to status hearings 169 8.10 Should status hearings be extended to the indictable jurisdiction? 170 8.10.1 Main aims of callovers and the role of the judge 170 8.10.2 Plea discussions and disclosure 170 8.10.3 Sentence indications 170 8.10.4 Protection of rights of accused, confidentiality and the media 171 8.10.5 Complainant’s participation in callovers 171 8.10.6 Statutory provisions or guidelines for callovers 172 8.11 The need for regulation 172 8.12 Benefits and disadvanta...

6. RIS Regulatory Systems Justice Amendment Bill package [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Children Act 2004 • Coroners Act 2006 • Courts Security Act 1999 • Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 • Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 • District Courts Act 2016 • Employment Relations Act 2000 • Juries Act 1981 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Senior Courts Act 2016 Tribunals • Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 • Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 • Remuneration...

7. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavits 3 of 4 [pdf, 30 MB]

   STATEMENT OF CHARLES LAMBERT IN SUPPORT OF NGĀTI PĀHAUWERA TAKUTAI MOANA NEGOTIATIONS I, CHARLES LAMBERT, Trustee/Manager, of Mohaka Township Road, Mohaka, would like to state that: 1. I support Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust in their application for this Takutai Moana claim. I am a Trustee for Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust. 2. I gave evidence in 2008 under the old Seabed and Foreshore Law. Attached to this letter is a copy of my 2008 evidence which

8. [2018] NZEnvC 227 Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Baines Hearing: at New Plymouth on 19-23 March 2018, 31 May 2018, 1 June 2018 and 27-30 August 2018 Site visit undertaken on 20 March 2018 Appearances: R B Enright and R G Haazen for Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated and for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated M G Conway and C G Coyle for South Taranaki District Council , New Plymouth District Council, Stratford District Council and Powerco Limited D Allen and V Brunton for Petroleum Exploration...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ANA SHAW v BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2022] NZEmpC 10 [4 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 10 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 15–17 June and 2 July 2021

10. Appendix-4_Peter-Kinley_-s87F-Report_Flooding-and-Hydrology_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

    .................................. 12 Review of whether the design meets the proposed thresholds ........... 14 The assessment of freeboard ............................................................. 16 The approach to assessing the effects of scour protection ................. 17 The assessment of the effects of the works on flooding of buildings ... 19 The assessment of debris arrestors ................................................... 20 The peer review ..................................