Search Results

Search results for care and protection.

5366 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZEnvC 024 Environmental Defence Society Inc v Minister for Environment [pdf, 373 KB]

    ...instance (that their counsel is aware of) in which a challenge to the lawfulness of an RMA national direction has been brought. That involved High Court judicial review proceedings. [28] While s310(a) confers a potentially broad power, it has been carefully and narrowly applied.19 Section 310 contains a closed list of matters. Moreover, the Environment Court does not possess inherent jurisdiction. [29] Section 310 does not list, as a matter for declaration, whether an instrument...

  2. YCAP - community planning guide [pdf, 8.7 MB]

    Community action planning guide He aratohu ki ngā mahere tukanga hapori YCAP Youth crime action plan 2013–2023 GU ID E CO M M UN IT Y AC TI ON P LA NN IN G THIS ARTWORK WAS CREATED BY YOUNG PEOPLE STAYING AT CHILD, YOUTH AND FAMILY RESIDENCES 11 Contents Introduction 3 7 STEPS FOR CREATING YOUR COMMUNITY’S ACTION PLAN Flowchart 5 Preparation 6 Understand your community 8 Clarify issues 10 Involve the community 12 Set goals 14 Finalise your plan 16 Pu

  3. LCRO 140/2020 AB v RP (27 November 2020) [pdf, 267 KB]

    ...submissions, the Committee decided to set the following matters down for a hearing on the papers:4 Fees: a) Did Mr AB fail to comply with r 3.4 (provision of information about fees) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 [the Rules]? b) Did Mr RP request, and was he provided with, an estimate of fees? If so, did GHJ inform him promptly when it became apparent that the estimate was likely to be exceeded? (r 9.4) c) Did Mr AB provide any i...

  4. [2019] NZEnvC 167 Western Bay of Plenty District Council v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 13 MB]

    ...underlined and words deleted shown struck through): Matakana Island's function appearaRce as a barrier for the harbour and its essentially uniform appearance, principally from middle- and long-distance views, stand out. Those attributes should be protected from activities that could suhstaRtfa.41y alter its integrity appearcmce, such as substantial permanent changes to its cover in trees, including the location of large or extensive buildings (including areas of smaller buildings) o...

  5. [2023] NZEnvC 116 Norrish v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 12 MB]

    ...landscapes that have "values of high significance". Objective 10.2.5 requires that SNLs (and Outstanding Natural Landscapes) are 25 Nonish v Dtmedin Ci!J CouncilEnvC C8/2002, 25 January 2002, at [4]. 26 ODP, Definitions p 3-16. 12 protected from inappropriate development, and their values are maintained and enhanced. [52] Ms James, the planning policy witness for the Council stated:27 LCAs in the ODP are the equivalent of SNLs in the 2GP, being landscapes that contr...

  6. Regulatory Impact Statement 2010 Alcohol Reform [pdf, 918 KB]

    1 ALCOHOL REFORM 2010: REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT Contents AGENCY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 3 INDICATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 4 PART 1 – ALCOHOL IN NEW

  7. ENV-2016-AKL-000186 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.6 MB]

    Notice of appeal to Environment Court against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan Dated: 16 September 2016 Before the Environment Court In the matter of: Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) - Appeal against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan – s 156(1) of the LGATPA – Topics 043 & 044 Transport - parking ratio for all activities in Viaduct Harbour Precin

  8. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

    DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v JUSTIN CAMPBELL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 [17 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 CRC 2/14 IN THE MATTER OF the referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) First Plaintiff AND MARCIA JOY COLLINS Second Plaintiff AND JUSTIN CAMPBELL First Defendant AND DEAN EGG

  9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 22/07 Tawhiwhirangi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...strongly suspect was committed. Nor is an acquittal by a court, even if a prosecution is brought, a determinative test for employment law purposes. So, too, with a decision not to prosecute. [53] Both employers and employees need to consider very carefully the strategic and legal grounds for a complaint of criminal offending or, even in the case of an employee, an insistence upon the employer making such a complaint. Many employers and employees have a misapprehension of the si...

  10. Henton v CAC 20003 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 2 [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...the appellant, of a property at 5B Ranier Street, Ellerslie, engaged the services of Barfoot’s to sell the property and the licensee was the listing salesperson. [4] The agency agreement included the notation “clients objecting to possible day care in local area”. [5] On 9 December 2011, the vendors entered into an agreement for sale and purchase for the property with Robin Hulford and/or nominee. That agreement became unconditional on 16 December 2011. [6] On 19 December 201...