Mason v REAA [2013] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 66 KB]
...concerning the application must be considered, not just the previous misconduct. The onus is on the candidate to show that he or she is a fit and proper person.” [13] The decision of Interim Advance Corporation Pt Ltd v Commissioner for Consumer Protection [2008] WASAT 81 provides useful guidance on the “fit and proper person” test in the context of a refusal to grant a credit provider’s licence. The State Administrative Tribunal considered a review of a decision not to grant...