5366 items matching your search terms
...following day, 17 February 2017, Mr AE again expressed his “disappointment” with the outcome. With a view to resolving his concerns 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, r 5.11. 3 he put forward three options for consideration by Ms NN for response by 4.00 pm that day. First, he and Mrs SL would claim compensation in the [Disputes] Tribunal; secondly, he would complain to the Law Soci...
...October 2017). 15 Mr BG did not think the appointment of [Firm B] as successor architect would be an issue. She says he has not vacillated from that view. [82] In that regard, I observe that Mr UL similarly says it is “debatable” if the protection to “the name Architect” in the Registered Architects Act 2005 “is intended to apply to the use of the name [Architect] for a person acting … as a certifier”. I also observe that whilst use of the NZIA form is reserved...
...information in his letter to the Complaints Service dated 28 November 2018. He submitted: (a) Mr YC and his employer [PK] were not in breach of the in-house counsel provisions of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). (b) Mr YC did not owe a duty to [XD], as he did not act for that company and owed it no duty of care. Mr ZB cannot comment on whether Mr YC’s representation of the liquidators of [WE] was competent. [32] In r...
...(n) not overseeing the correct completion of the death certificate such that it implied that the applicants were the children of Mrs EG rather than Mrs RT;4 (o) failing to have the house valued after death; (p) failing to secure or adequately care for the house and personal effects inside it; (q) not responding appropriately to requests from the applicants for distribution of chattels; (r) failing to investigate alleged loans to various people and/or failure to disclose informatio...
...Unit at ARWCF. Ms Williams says that on 27 May 2020 she was assaulted by a fellow prisoner. As a result of the alleged assault, Ms Williams says she required hospitalisation and an operation. Because of this, Ms Williams was unable to see or care for her baby and she was unable to continue breastfeeding. [10] Following the alleged assault, Mr Tennet, engaged the services of Mr Hikaka (a private investigator operating a business called Hikaka Investigations Ltd) to interview M...
...the identified provisions of the Code: 6 (1) Relied on an unlicensed person to communicate with the complainant which appears to have enabled the provision of immigration advice, thereby acting unprofessionally and failing to exercise due care, in breach of cl 1. (2) Failed to interact directly with the complainant and obtain his informed instructions, in breach of cl 2(e). (3) Enabled the provision of immigration advice by an unlicensed person, in breach of cl 3(c). (4)...
...No party has sought an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. 7 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 50. 8 Section 51(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 10 Z, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]....
................................................................................. 23 WHAT IS THE REMEDIAL WORK REQUIRED TO ADDRESS THE DEFECTS? .................................................................................................. 23 CAN DIRECTORS OF COMPANIES INVOLVED IN CONSTRUCTION OWE A DUTY OF CARE TO SUBSEQUENT OWNERS? .................................... 25 RESPONSIBILITY OF MR HUNG ............................................................... 26 RESPONSIBILITY OF...
...words of real people describing often traumatic events, and at a time when they are potentially distressed and vulnerable. It was not possible to seek consent from those who gave evidence. However, given that such trials are typically closed for the protection of a complainants’ privacy, only research such as this allows for scrutiny of the processes that are occurring in Aotearoa courts. Transcripts were redacted prior to the analysis to remove any identifying details. This was carried...
...payments to anyone without the Court’s approval. That direction was issued for the very reason that should any further payments be made they would be subject to further claims of imprudent conduct in the absence of Court approval. So as to protect the interests of the trust as well as Mr Puriri the direction was issued that payments should cease without the Court’s approval. [12] That as the applicants allege Mr Puriri appears to seek to limit the access by properly appointed...