Search Results

1. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   437 Aotea MB 86 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43, 19(1)(a), (b), (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW

2. Recommendations recap - issue 10 [pdf, 1021 KB]

   1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 10 2 Coroners have a duty to identify any lessons learned from the deaths referred to them that might help prevent such deaths occurring in the future. In order to publicise these lessons, the findings and recommendations of most cases are open to the public. Recommendations Recap identifies and summarises all coronial recommendations that have been made over the relevant period. Wh

3. [2022] NZEnvC 178 Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 698 KB]

   Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 178 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN LOMAI PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000021) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Order: 27 September

4. Skerrett-White - Allotments 302 - 315 town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18 - 20 (2013) 2013 Chief Judge's MB 473 (2013 CJ 473) [pdf, 393 KB]

   ...appropriateness of not only the applications themselves, but also the adequacy of process, including proper notification to affected parties, upon which these applications are based. [102] Counsel continues that this application strikes to the core of the protective mechanisms that resonate within the Māori Land legislative regime. The trust order provides that the proceeds of the land were to be held for the Ngāti Hinerangi Trust. In the application for the ahu whenua trust, a...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Te Paparahi o Te Raki - statement of issues for stage 2 [pdf, 595 KB]

   Te Paparahi o Te Raki (Wai 1040) Regional Inquiry Tribunal Statement of Issues for Stage 2 5 December 2012 Wai 1040, #1.4.2 MERITDA Official MERITDA RECEIVED NO DATE MERITDA Text Box 5 Dec 2012 2 CONTENTS  TRIBUNAL STATEMENT OF ISSUES FOR STAGE 2: INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 3  1. TINO RANGATIRATANGA, KĀWANATANGA AND AUTONOMY: POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT BETWEEN MĀORI  A

6. Affirmation of Mr Nicholas Head dated 9 December 2016 [pdf, 32 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV-2016-CHC-071 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations under Part 12 of the Act ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED Applicant MACKENZIE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AFFIRMATION OF NICHOLAS JOHN HEAD ON BEHALF OF THE ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC 9 December 2016 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc.

7. Firearms-Reform-Programme-Phase-4_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...harm, and e) provide for effective and efficient delivery of service. 1 We have amended criteria d) slightly to reflect the key importance that public safety will have in the systematic rewrite of the Act. It previously read "contribute to protecting the public from firearms-related harm". 3 In Confidence 3. Approach to the work Recognising the wide public interest and diversity of views about firearms regulation, the approach to regulatory reform will: a) be undert...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 018 Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...rules apply also to the other zones. Prohibited or non-complying activity status? [62] As the parties will have divined, the court would approve a non-complying activity status for Rules 12.1.5(b), (c) and (d) and Rule 3.1.5(e). [63] We listened carefully to Mr Carlyon's rationale for these activities to be prohibited. He is particularly concerned that existing operators would not be proactive in reducing their risk profile, particularly in response to neighbouring sensitive ac...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 056 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 663 KB]

   ...a single legal entity, must act with integrity and accountability. We do not see any basis on which a council can assert that it is able to split itself. If it is to act as both appellant and consent authority, then it must do so in a way that carefully addresses and avoids apparent conflicts and minimises procedural complications. [52] On that basis, there are further issues arising which include determining what procedure should be adopted by the Court to ensure that the appeal is...

10. 951650-Kainga-Ora-evidence-Phil-Jaggard-Stormwater-and-Flooding.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...develop a suitable contract and safety plans to decommission the Rapaki and recover the heritage items during December and over the Christmas break. Due to the condition of the Rapaki, there were several significant risks that required oversight and careful management particularly due to the evidence of significant corrosion. Key risks identified were asbestos removal; failure of the crane superstructure; hull breach or failure; failure of propellers seals and failure to recover heri...