Search Results

1. EV v IG LCRO 111/2013 (8 September 2015) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...its jurisdiction may do no more than impose unnecessary burden on its resources. [93] It was my sense that Mr EV advanced his application from a genuine conviction that Mr IG’s conduct required a disciplinary response. However, after giving careful consideration to all the material before me, I see no grounds to depart from the Committee’s decision to take no further action on the complaint. Decision Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decisi...

2. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...any practice notes”.28 [82] In summary, publication of the name of a lawyer against whom a finding of unsatisfactory conduct has been made is not so much to punish the lawyer but, taking into account the consumer purposes of the Act, to afford protection to the public where considered necessary. The Guidelines for Parties to Review for this Office include that if a Committee has ordered publication of a lawyer’s name, then the Review Officer “will take into account the … Co...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 178 Te Raranga a Te Kuihi Trust v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...goods, services and facilities to meet the day to day needs of the surrounding community. The local shops within NCA provide a limited range of everyday goods and services. Community facilities can include shared community spaces (e.g. hall), health care facilities, and early childhood facilities (e.g. kohanga reo). The intent is to create a Hauora area for community wellness, and for the Hauora area to be the heart of the community. Being located within easy walking distance of the res...

4. INZ (Calder) v Shearer [2019] NZIACDT 41 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2019] NZIACDT 41 Reference No: IACDT 030/17 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN IMMIGRATION NEW ZEALAND (DARREN CALDER) Complainant AND MARIA CHARINA (CHARIE) SHEARER Adviser SUBJECT TO SU

5. Characteristics associated with the early identification of complex Family Court custody cases [pdf, 89 KB]

   Characteristics associated with the early identification of complex Family Court custody cases Prepared for the Department for Courts Helena Barwick Alison Gray Roger Macky DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department for Courts. First published September 2003 Department for Courts PO Box 2750 Well

6. RIS-Strengthening-electoral-offences-relating-to-improper-influence_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 399 KB]

   ...change will provide clarity to political parties and candidates about what is permitted near voting places. It will protect voters from any perceived improper influence as they enter voting places. Proposal 2 – enrolment offences Voters may be protected from improper influence over their enrolment. Balance of benefits and costs (Core information) Does the RIS indicate that the benefits of the Minister’s preferred option are likely to outweigh the costs? Proposal 1 – strengthenin...

7. Recommendations recap - issue 10 [pdf, 1021 KB]

   1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 10 2 Coroners have a duty to identify any lessons learned from the deaths referred to them that might help prevent such deaths occurring in the future. In order to publicise these lessons, the findings and recommendations of most cases are open to the public. Recommendations Recap identifies and summarises all coronial recommendations that have been made over the relevant period. Wh

8. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   437 Aotea MB 86 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43, 19(1)(a), (b), (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW

9. [2022] NZEnvC 178 Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 698 KB]

   Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 178 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN LOMAI PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000021) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Order: 27 September

10. Skerrett-White - Allotments 302 - 315 town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18 - 20 (2013) 2013 Chief Judge's MB 473 (2013 CJ 473) [pdf, 393 KB]

    ...appropriateness of not only the applications themselves, but also the adequacy of process, including proper notification to affected parties, upon which these applications are based. [102] Counsel continues that this application strikes to the core of the protective mechanisms that resonate within the Māori Land legislative regime. The trust order provides that the proceeds of the land were to be held for the Ngāti Hinerangi Trust. In the application for the ahu whenua trust, a...