RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]
...that the Practitioner had not undertaken sufficient enquiry into their claims and had not applied for Legal Aid. The allegations against the Practitioner, were that he: • Acted incompetently. • Did not follow instructions. • Failed to protect the interests of the RS/AS whānau. • Failed to adequately inform the RS/AS whānau. • Did not adequately keep the RS/AS whānau aware of legal costs. • The costs should go to/be paid by Legal Aid. [6] The Practitioner’s...