Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]
...consent, they were not in the possession of the builder for this purpose and there was no contract in which Mr Veltman agreed to provide such services. 36. The only claim that could be made is in relation to negligence. Mr Veltman owed no duty of care to any of the parties in relation to the preparation of plans for Fyfe Homes. He does not acquire a duty of care if the plans are used in breach of the terms on which they were given to Mr Dixon. He does not acquire a duty of care if...