5436 items matching your search terms
20 Schedules CB305 S C H E D U L E S 20-2 Regional Plan: Water for Otago, updated to 1 July 2018 Table of Contents for Schedules 1 to 17 1. Schedule of natural and human use values of Otago’s surface water bodies ...........................................................................................................................4 1A Schedule of natural values .......................................................................6 1AA Schedule of Ota
Tribunal Guidelines Choosing the right decision-making body Equipping tribunals to operate effectively Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or e
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 001 Ref: LCRO 111/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND AP Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introducti
...the invoiced charges: 5 See paragraph [39]. 10 [redacted] [54] The relationship broke down after the applicant’s receipt of the liability and cost estimate. The applicant made a complaint to the firm expressed in terms of the “client care” statements in the preface to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). [55] The parties had an exchange in which the respondent took the position that the court proceedings were soun...
...at the motel and I deal with you on that basis.” [k] His Honour went on to note her lesser role in the kidnapping, her withdrawal from the scene, and that she was not involved in the detention. Judge Wilson also noted that the applicant was caring for a child. [28] Judge Wilson’s sentencing notes do not appear to have been before the Registrar when she made her decision. [29] The applicant wrote a further letter to the Tribunal which was included with her Application to R...
...7.10 At the time of writing the Report, approval from RFA (owners of the Maritime Museum) had only been provided in principle. We considered that the effects on the Maritime Museum will generate significant disruption to its activities, and very careful attention would be required to ensure the effects are managed as best they can be. As set out above, RFA has since provided the Applicant with unconditional approval of the Application, and therefore the effects on the Maritime Mus...
...A JSC could only have taken place if both parties agreed to such a possibility. It is evident from the Court’s file that mutual consent for a JSC was not given. Nor is there any evidence of a Calderbank offer being advanced which may have protected the Council if the matter was indeed capable of settlement. [62] In the absence of detailed evidence as to how the mediation issue unfolded after 9 March 2016, I do not consider it appropriate to conclude that a costs adjustment sh...
...him, he would be irritated. [51] As well, time better spent elsewhere is then devoted to challenging the demand. [52] Equally, I accept that Mr MD quite reasonably believed that he could rely on the accuracy of his client. Mr S is obviously a careful and experienced businessman with emphasis on financial management. [53] I do not for one moment think that the February 2018 error was anything more than that: an oversight. [54] There is merit in the suggestion that when a default i...
...that remains the case, I do not consider that an order under s 18(1)(a) declaring any equitable interest that the successors of Mrs Ormsby might have in the joint tenancy, would offend the provisions of s 77 of the Act. The Court must of course be careful that any such determination does not seek to annul, quash, declare or hold that the 1992 order is invalid. [34] I now consider the law on strike out. This was summarised by this Court in Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club Ltd:9 [2...
...the WHT’s jurisdiction, and compiles the defects, relevant dates and likely liable parties. It provides the WHT member with key information to consider a strike out or removal application. In this Tribunal there is no such report. Therefore, care must be taken when seeking analogies between the jurisdictions. [30] Having reviewed the authorities, I conclude the following: (a) When removal of a party or parties has the effect of striking out a claim the key question is whether t...