Search Results

1. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of submissions [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Review of the AML/CFT Act Summary of submissions Ministry of Justice March 2022 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be constr

2. Trustees of the Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts v Orbell - Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts (2015) 28 Te Waipounamu MB 37 (28 TWP 37) [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...owners in relation to the Waitutu Incorporation and Stewart Island blocks in 1996 and 1999. [15] In 2002, the Crown initiated a formal SILNA forests policy to promote sustainable management of the forests on a voluntary basis through conservation protection or sustainable forest management under the Forests (West Coast Accord) Act 2000. Under the policy, voluntary conservation protection was offered to owners of high priority SILNA forests. This was to be achieved through creati...

3. Collective impact toolbox [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...idea? How can you influence them? What are their concerns? What features of your idea will appeal? How will risk be minimised? People feel loss more acutely than gain, even for the same objective amount. Show people how their interests will still be protected if things go wrong. Who are the other stakeholders? Who would the idea affect? What would they say to decision makers? Do any of them have close links to influential decision makers? Can you adapt your idea to cover their concerns?...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 153 Savage v Wai Shing Ltd [pdf, 545 KB]

   ...This would include cutting and clearing unwanted plants down to ground level, then applying a weed killer. The second aspect of the job was to use a knapsack sprayer to spray smaller unwanted plant species. Mr Savage was directed to wear protective clothing. It was stated that there was no requirement for him to attend the company’s office or come onto company property outside of normal working hours. [38] There is a dispute between the parties as to how long he woul...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 222 Flashoff v New Zealand Technology Group Hawkes Bay Ltd [pdf, 311 KB]

   HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF v NEW ZEALAND TECHNOLOGY GROUP HAWKES BAY LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 222 [9 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 222 EMPC 319/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HAIG DAVID CHARLES FLASHOFF First Plaintiff AND DONALD PETER PRICE Second Plaintiff AND RAYMON

6. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 2 Northern South Island [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   RA N G A H A U A WH A N U I DI S T R I C T 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON PA R T I I OC T O B E R 1996 WO R K I N G PA P E R : FI R S T RE L E A S E WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11b: Hawke’s Bay, D Cowi

7. [2011] NZEmpC 96 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...that the plaintiff had consulted her on 6 July 2011 as symptoms of the depression and PTSD from which she had suffered in the past were returning. It further stated that her current unwellness was caused by a combination of stress associated with caring for a much loved terminally ill mother and the impending Court case. In deference to the plaintiff’s current state of health, and because her mother may only have months to live, Dr Sawrey respectfully suggested that the hearing b...

8. Leef v Leef - Panguru A47B (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 11 (113 TTK 11) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...“PVC reservoir and sanitary sewerage disposal unit, septic tank and soakage fields and connection pipes to the building is excluded from the sale” (sic). These were to be left in the land. Other clauses addressed the fact that Robert was to take care of all permits etc for removal of the house and was to be responsible for protecting other improvements on the land. [29] Robert paid the purchase price but did not remove the house. It remains there today. Instead, Robert say...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 36 Western Bay of Plenty DHB v McInnes [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...expenditure of rate payer funds. The Council also submits that if Mr McInnes is reinstated on an interim basis a contractor will almost certainly leave, and need to be replaced, and that there is a risk that Mr Wheeler will resign. [73] I have carefully considered the position in relation to the potential effect on third parties, including the potential impact on Mr McInnes’ family if they are required to move out of the ranger house. That has not been assisted by the paucit...

10. E17 Geraint Bermingham - Navigation - EIC - Applicant [pdf, 781 KB]

    ...USE 6.1 The Proposal is situated in Freemans Bay. This is a relatively exposed area open to the northerly quarter, and to some extent the north-east wind and wake from passing marine traffic, resulting in the need to construct breakwaters to protect the race boat berthing areas. The exposed aspects resulting from this wind and wake also means that the only areas of sheltered water are those created by the proposed and existing breakwaters, and so only a limited number of recreat...