Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 132 Caradoc-Davies v S R Clearwater [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...contour) . [35] Counsel quoted other portions of the Landscape Assessment Report discussing screening available from some existing pine trees, with visual outcomes being very minor in effect as a result. [36] Since the hearing this week I have carefully reconsidered everything that was placed before me in writing, and heard and recorded in Court. Unfortunately, I consider that a good deal of what was advanced was at sixes and sevens with the essence of the case. For instance, in h...

2. LCRO 55/2024 EFH and KFH v SP and NR (15 October 2024) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...be consistent with the comment at paragraph [30] of the decision in BAB v PW2 that “[i]t is … self evident that the lodgement of the caveat was done for the purpose of causing unnecessary inconvenience if there was no legitimate interest to be protected”. [90] I would qualify that comment by referring to “no legitimate claim of interest to be protected”. 1 MN v RK [2020] NZLCRO 172. 2 BAB v PW LCRO 4/2011 (14 August 2012). 3 [91] There is of course an inherent di...

3. NZCVS Cycle 3 topical module report - Patterns of victimisation by family members and help-seeking by victims - data tables [xlsx, 708 KB]

   ...attribute the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution, not the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. Data tables for NZCVS topical report – Cycle 1 (2018) & Cycle 3 (2019/20) pooled data Pat...

4. 2021-04-21 Transcript (up to end of day 20) [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...you give me that number of just individual 15 applications? A. Some of them are individuals and some of them are sub-catchments, the Manuherikia is an example where one application or one applicant can represent, so that with the Manuherikia Care Irrigation Co-operative Society, that represents in excess of 300 water users I think. 20 Q. So you’ve worked on that one and got it to the Resource Consent Application stage? A. Yes so in the Man- Q. And it’s now been lodged I un...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 189 H v A Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   H v A Ltd NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 189 [7 October 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 189 ARC 27/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A Ltd Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 August 2014 (heard at Auckland) Appearances: R Harrison QC and C Abaffy, counsel for the plaintiff P Caisley, counsel for the defendant Jud

6. Graeme James Lawrence - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...benefits of a prohibited activity rule • Opportunity cost for harvesting species in discrete locations2 G Little overlap between fishing effort and ecologically significant marine sites.3 • Efficiency of providing whole of community benefit in protection of known sites and this benefit is greater than cost to individual fishers. • Effective in achieving protection, will assist in achieving enhancement and restoration. b. Rebuttal Evidence (14 September 2016) in respect to...

7. Hunia v Skerrett-White - Kawerau A8D (2016) 146 Waiariki MB 281 (146 WAR 281) [pdf, 620 KB]

   146 Waiariki MB 281 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20100012352 UNDER Sections 19, 37, 237, 238 and 240 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Kawerau A8 D Block BETWEEN KANI HUNIA Applicant AND COLLEEN SKERRETT-WHITE AND TOMAIRANGI FOX Respondents Hearings: 22 Waiariki MB 56-91 dated 20 December 2010 46 Waiariki MB 239-276 dated 29 November 2011 93 Waiariki MB 259-269 dated 17 March 2014 11

8. [2022] NZEmpC 145 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 940 KB]

   ...an important source 8 Maritime Union of New Zealand v TLNZ Ltd [2007] ERNZ 593 (EmpC) at [14]. of reference whenever the admissibility of evidence is challenged or otherwise in question. ... [27] So seen, the Court should consider carefully, and be influenced by, the general law of evidence in exercising its broad discretionary jurisdiction under s 189(2) of the Employment Relations Act... [70] In more recent cases, the Court has considered that the focus of the inqu...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 027 Lake Road Preservation Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...decision of Court), Te Arai South Holdings Limited, Te Arai South Partners Limited, Te Arai North Limited, Te Uri O Hau Settlement Trust (abide decision of Court) CM Harris in Person (section 274 party) S Levet Silverhill Ltd and A Cotter Contractors Protection Association, D Woolley (section 274 interested parties) - no appearance DECISION ON APPEAL AND APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT ORDERS Application for consent A. The decision of the Council commissioners is confirmed being refusal...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 186 Lund v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...the potential for industrial activities to be able to successfully operate in these locations. Such encroachment also exacerbates potential reverse sensitivity issues. For this reason, one of the primary focusses of the Industrial Zone is the protection of industrial zoned land for industrial activities. [62] These passages are followed by the statement that: In response to these issues, the Plan provisions proposed to protect the existing clusters of industrial zoning, including...