Wright v CAC 10056 & Woods [2011] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 169 KB]
...recorded in writing that the vendors had told her that not all of the grassed area was part of the property or this could have formed part of the material made available to purchasers when they marketed the property. This would have been a further protection for Ms Wright. However, Ms Wright does seem to have been at pains in her email of 20th April to point out to the Woods that the aerial photograph would help with the boundary identification, i.e. attempting to provide information abo...