Search Results

1. Social Wellbeing and Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System Report [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...NZCVS Cycle 2 (2018/19) 2.2 Social wellbeing and victimisation There is reason to believe that social wellbeing might affect an individual’s risk of being a victim, and vice versa. For example, being part of a well-connected community could be protective of victimisation. Also, experiencing a crime could reduce one’s general trust of others in society. Figure 2.7 shows that two of three indicators of social connectedness tend to be poorer amongst adults who had experienced c...

2. NZCVS topical report Cycle 2 (2019) - Social wellbeing and perceptions of the criminal justice system [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...NZCVS Cycle 2 (2018/19) 2.2 Social wellbeing and victimisation There is reason to believe that social wellbeing might affect an individual’s risk of being a victim, and vice versa. For example, being part of a well-connected community could be protective of victimisation. Also, experiencing a crime could reduce one’s general trust of others in society. Figure 2.7 shows that two of three indicators of social connectedness tend to be poorer amongst adults who had experienced c...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 492 KB]

   KAMLESH PRASAD v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 [29 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First Plaintiff AND LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant AND SO

4. [2021] NZEnvC 136 The Canyon Vineyard Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   THE CANYON VINEYARD LTD v CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 136 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN THE CANYON VINEYARD LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-137) Appellant AND CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND BENDIGO STATION LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge P A Steven En

5. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 - 8 to 26 March 2021 [updated] [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

6. Transcript - Hearing - PC7 8 - 26 March [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

7. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL NOE [pdf, 6.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju

8. National Standards Committee 1 v Haines [2022] NZLCDT 10 (8 April 2022) [pdf, 551 KB]

   ...complainant. [5] There are common elements in almost all of the charges which allege improper fee charging and fee taking practices, overcharging, conflicts of interest, failures to secure independent advice and other less serious breaches of the Client Care Rules.1 [6] We set out the background of the M1 and M2 cases together, but analyse the issues raised by each set of charges separately. [7] We then consider each of the last two sets of charges relating to complainants R and C...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 83 George v Auckland Council [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...elevate an incident of relatively minor misconduct to an offence of serious misconduct by electing to not believe the employee’s explanation. If that was lawful then the effect would be the routine circumvention by employers of the statutory protection employees have against unjustified dismissal under the Employment Relations Act 2000. That is, it would be a very simple matter for employers to summarily dismiss their employees for any minor incident of alleged misconduct and...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 91 Ball v Healthcare of NZ Ltd [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...application within three years of raising a grievance with her employer. As the Authority member noted, had she done so immediately following receipt of the information pack she would have been well within the three year time limit. He concluded, after carefully considering each of the relevant considerations, that the balance of justice weighed against the grant of an extension of time. [17] The Authority member adopted an entirely conventional approach to determining whether...