[2016] NZEmpC 16 Best Health Products Ltd v Nee [pdf, 172 KB]
...only partially successful, it ought to have a contribution to the costs it had incurred, which were said to amount to over $18,000 plus GST. [8] The Authority found that it was understandable that Ms Nee had wanted to be certain that she could protect herself from the employer’s claims, although they were completely fanciful; allowance for that factor was provided for in fixing costs. The Authority also held that there was simply no evidence that BHPL had incurred $18,000 plus...