5366 items matching your search terms
Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co
...hearing, I issued a direction as to the nature and scope of the non-de novo challenge, as required under s 182(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). As I noted when dealing with this aspect, the making of such a direction involves a careful analysis of pleadings in order to determine the issues. I also observed that the Court is required to exercise a discretion in making the direction; s 182(3) does not contain any restrictions as to the exercise of that discretion, a...
...attribute the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution, not the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. Data tables for NZCVS Key findings – Cycle 4 (2020/21) Section 6: Impact of the COVID-19 Pand...
...something Ngāti Uenuku, as represented by counsel, identify with. [63] Mr Bennion argued that although the political landscape in 1997 was different and Ngāti Rangi was growing at that time, it is the Court’s role, under s 132 of the Act, to carefully check that it has the necessary evidence and processes to ensure that long-standing customary interests are protected. It is important to appreciate the claim that Ngāti Rangi alone has the entire customary interests in this bloc...
...attribute the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution, not the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. Data tables for Māori victimisation in Aotearoa/New Zealand mailto:NZCVS@justice.govt.nz Terms...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 048/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ERNEST FINDLAY HEADS PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr F McCrimmon for plaintiff Mr IC Carter and Ms AL Graham for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 19, 20 and 21 February 2013; 23 and 24 Ap
...principal responsibility for the management of the trust and its assets. Only where there is evidence of an actual or potential breach of duties and risk to the trust will the Court invoke its powers as set out in Part 12 of the Act to endeavour to protect the interests of the beneficiaries of the trust. [24] In the present case on the issue of the prudent management of the Trust’s forestry interests I consider that there is insufficient evidence presently before the Court to war...
...The precision that is expected is a matter a licensed immigration adviser must impress upon clients. A form that looks to be in order may well contain inaccurate information, and have irreparable consequences for a client. It is a obligation of care and professionalism to ensure a client understands these obligations and consequences (clause 1.1) [86] Mr van Zyl simply checked forms that were presented to him. He had no contact with Mr K. He could not, and did not, discharge any of t...
...of status produces better prices, while often hele, is no reason to change status, That would be the case on every proposal to alienate Maori land, If price were a valid argument, the effect would be to remove the interest of the wider kin group so carefully protected in the Act in the ordinary nll1 of cases," [30] Neveliheless, in Wainlli 2F4D the Court did change the status of a portion of the land to enable the owner to develop the balance of the land, But the Court expressly ref...
...involved fewer attendances at the investigation meeting, it was nonetheless potentially a very significant claim. Mr Rodionov could not have assumed that Ozone’s claims for damages and/or a penalty would be futile. It was not unreasonable for careful preparation to be devoted to the counter-claim, and for the relevant issues to be explored. e) To some extent, Mr Rodionov was locked into his claim, because it raised issues that were also potentially relevant to the counter-claim...