Kendal v Sherbourne LCRO 69 / 2009 (19 August 2009) [pdf, 57 KB]
...possibility of such conflicting advice is suggestive of an actual conflict of interest. Even with consent it is never open to a lawyer to act in the interests of one party and against the interests of the other. [71] I have considered this question carefully and formed the view that the deed of acknowledgement of debt is substantially in a standard form. In the same way that the agreement for sale and purchase contained terms that favoured one party or the other but were not realis...