5249 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 093 Ref: LCRO 188/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN P & R MC Applicant AND JK and UV Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction
110 Tairawhiti MB 238 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAIRĀWHITI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tairāwhiti District A20190011094 WĀHANGA Under Section 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Wharekahika A47 I WAENGA I A Between ASHLEY BROOKING Te kaitono Applicant ME And APIRANA MAPUROA HENDERSON Te kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 31 January 2020,
...a proposed application and of any mitigation or work around. [64] On the evidence before the Tribunal, the Registrar considers that Ms Luv has breached cl 1 of the Code by acting contrary to the obligation to be diligent and to exercise due care, by not realising the work experience declared with the level 6 qualification would not meet the points requirement, and not properly advising the complainant of the risk. [65] The Registrar considers that the expression had little or no...
...ADDRESSING ADVERSE EFFECTS 35. The approach taken to managing the effects of this Project is underpinned by the sustainable management purpose of the RMA that includes, amongst other things: Page 14 (a) managing the use, development and protection of natural and physical resources in a way that “enables” people to provide for their social, economic and cultural wellbeing and health and safety; and (b) avoiding, remedying, or mitigating any adverse effects of activiti...
...the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution. Do not use the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/NZCVS-Y2-core-report-for-release-.p...
...that the noise assessment material provided in evidence did not refer to activities outside of the specific ones listed. [82] We delete what is in the term/definition column provided in the track change draft from NZTA and replace it with: Protected premises and facilities, being those buildings and activities specified below on those properties identified in Schedule 9 where the relevant noise criteria (new road or altered road) is also defined in Schedule 9: (a) Buildings used...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 35 Reference No. HRRT 014/2014 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND DAVID JAMES CRAMPTON DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings with Ms JV Emerson Ms L Caris and Mr J Miller for defendant
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA
...plan provided in Appendix E of the “Baseline” report is of too greater scale to confirm the modifications made for the “With-Scheme” model are appropriate for describing the effects. This should include information on the locations of scour protection. 87. Could the Applicant please provide further information to support the statement in section 2.8, Para 3 (Page 16, Appendix F.2) of the “With-Scheme Report”, that the impact of scour protection on modelled water levels is ex...
...attribute the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and follow any other licence terms. Please note you may not use any government department’s emblem, logo or coat of arms in a way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution. Do not use the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. If you have any feedback or questions about this report, please email us at nzcvs@justice.gov...