Search Results

Search results for care and protection.

5448 items matching your search terms

  1. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2200 A186 Scoping report [pdf, 3.3 MB]

    Wai 2200 Ngātiawa / Te Āti Awa Research Needs Scoping Report Tony Walzl WALGHAN PARTNERS 18 January 2016 Wai 2200 Porirua ki Manawatū District Inquiry Report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal Wai 2200, #A186 camerja Official camerja Received camerja Text Box 18 Jan 2016 2 Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................

  2. Conviction and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand 1997 to 2006 [pdf, 4 MB]

    Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1997 to 2006 Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1997 to 2006 Bronwyn Morrison Nataliya Soboleva Jin Chong April 2008 Published April 2008 Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand www.justice.govt.nz ISSN 1177-9799 (Online) © Crown Copyright 2 Conv

  3. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...which assures every person of the: right to the observance of the principles of natural justice by any tribunal or other public authority which has the power to make a determination in respect of that person’s rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law. [33] Mr [ZA] also relies on Saxmere or Muir “generically” and on Greymouth or Bassett “specifically”, “such that permanent recusal in all matters is warranted”. Saxmere Company Limited v Wool Board...

  4. ZA v YB LCRO 23/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...what he describes as “ex parte” communications between this Office and Mr [YB]. On 1 August 2016 Registry staff provided copies of “items of administrative type correspondence” that had not previously been provided to Mr [ZA]. [28] I have carefully considered all of the materials Mr [ZA] has supplied in the course of this review in pursuit of my recusal, including the collation of materials provided by Ms [WD] on 3 June. I am also conscious that Mr [ZA] has concerns about exchan...

  5. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...which assures every person of the: right to the observance of the principles of natural justice by any tribunal or other public authority which has the power to make a determination in respect of that person’s rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law. [33] Mr [ZA] also relies on Saxmere or Muir “generically” and on Greymouth or Bassett “specifically”, “such that permanent recusal in all matters is warranted”. Saxmere Company Limited v Wool Board...

  6. [2019] NZREADT 49 - CAC 521 v Wright (13 November 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

    ...the charge of misconduct under s 73(a) of the Act. We gave Mr Belcher leave to file written submissions as to penalty. These were received on 4 October 2019. Penalty principles [52] The principal purpose of the Act is to “promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work.”9 The Act achieves these purposes by regulating agents, branch managers...

  7. Nikora v Trustees of Tuhoe - Te Uru Taumatua Trust (2021) 252 Waiariki MB 157 (252 WAR 157) [pdf, 342 KB]

    ...extensive knowledge and experience in business administration and in terms of Te Reo Māori and Tūhoe culture. Mr Nikora also sought the appointment of an internal auditor whose duties would include ensuring that the assets of the trust are fully protected, 252 Waiariki MB 165 that all contractual and legal obligations are adequately provided for and met, that the trustees are accountable and transparent to a high level and that there are adequate systems in place to achie...

  8. [2024] NZEmpC 136 Stellar Elements New Zealand Limited v Amesbury [pdf, 329 KB]

    ...discussed this point. I have concluded, for present purposes, that Mr Amesbury’s claims as to whether the dismissal was justified are strongly arguable, as is his case for permanent reinstatement. Accordingly, the merits also favour interim protection being granted until the investigative process is concluded. [120] Next, Mr Erickson submitted that there could be a potential impact on third parties if an interim reinstatement order were to be made. This was put on the basis of...

  9. Evesham v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 136 / 2009 (5 November 2009) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...of a practitioner…”. It was argued that Mr D Evesham was not fairly put on notice of the “act, omission, allegation, practice, or other matter” which was under investigation. [47] I have considered the process of the Standards Committee carefully. I have before me the entire Standards Committee file and have read it all. It is not tenable to suggest that Mr D Evesham did not know the nature of the allegation against him. The transactions in question where clearly identified...

  10. 01.-Evidence-of-Mr-Lonnie-Dalzell-Waka-Kotahi-Project-Overview64017177.1.PDF [PDF, 855 KB]

    ...within the Project earlier, we have had the potential to maximise opportunities and broader Project outcomes. 39. The Kāpiti and Horowhenua districts have considerable historical and contemporary significance. Ō2NL looks to acknowledge and protect the region’s history through our ongoing partnership, examples of this in practice include the selection of the chosen route, the Cultural and Environmental Design Framework (CEDF), mahi toi, our kaitiaki strategy, integrated Projec...