5313 items matching your search terms
CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP v IVA MARIA GRANT [2024] NZEmpC 127 [17 July 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 127 EMPC 344/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP First Plaintiff AND CARRINGTON HOLIDAY PARK JADE LP Second Plaintiff AND WILLIAM TAN Third Plai
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CJC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 10 May 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environment Judge J E B
...trustees employ a representative called the Owhiti Monitor Position to observe the works. The Council agreed to reimburse the owners for the cost of employing the monitor to a maximum of $35,000 and to pay for reasonable costs for clothing and protective gear and costs for a one day protocol training hui. The contact person noted in the agreement is Vernon Winitana. Procedural history [9] The application was first heard before Judge Milroy on 25 November 2011 where she clarified...
...that pilot strike action was avoided. [32] NZALPA then proposed the wording of what is now cl 24.2 and its inclusion in the parties’ first collective agreement to be made under Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). It did so in an attempt to protect the terms and conditions of its Air New Zealand pilot members and, indirectly, its own membership strength, by seeking to have a ratchet arrangement included in its collective agreement. It intended that if, following settlement o...
...comments on the draft report prior to it being sent to the decision-maker. [44] Mr Goel went through the draft report and added his comments to the document through "track changes" which were highlighted in red. Mr Firman said that he carefully considered all of Mr Goel's comments but they did not lead him to change his conclusions or recommendations. He then proceeded to finalise his Formal Investigation Report which was dated 31 January 2013 and sent it through to...
...Wenley acknowledged for example that there is an argument that the deed between Tauwhareroa Trust and Mohaka A4 Trust was voidable. [58] In addition, the role of the former trustees, which has been under scrutiny for some time, will need to be carefully assessed in the context of any breaches of their duties that 32 Takitimu MB 79 may require a remedy from this Court. I refer in particular to the use of trust assets, potential conflicts of interest and the apparent failure to...
...Minimum Wage Act because of the way in which it calculated and paid commission and/or discretionary incentives. Because there is no definition of “wages” in s 6 in the Minimum Wage Act, reliance was placed on the extended definition in the Wages Protection Act 1983 to encompass payments such as bonuses and special payments agreed to be paid for the performance of work. [72] The company characterised its commissions, and incentive payments, as bonuses and submitted that, as a...