5249 items matching your search terms
60 Tākitimu MB 7 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150004913 A20150003172 A20140012724 UNDER Section 67, 315 and 326(b), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rotopounamu 1B1A BETWEEN GARY HUATA, BRENDA NICOLE KUPA, PATON LUXFORD, DAVID WHATANUI PUNA, TE ROERA CLIVE DAVID PUNA AND JEAN YORSTEN AS TRUSTEES OF ROTOPOUNAMU 1B1A AHU WHENUA TRUST AND PETER ROBIN, RAYMOND PUNA, NI
232 Waikato Maniapoto MB 219 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20180003037 WĀHANGA Under Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Huruhi 12B I WAENGA I A Between ERIN ASHMORE Te kaitono Applicant ME And MARK ARMSTRONG, REREMOANA ASHMORE, PHYLLIS HEEMI, GARETH NEWTON, JUSTINE NEWTON, R
...is very important to me and the LT. Organisational culture, the 'how we do things around the PDS', underpinned by our PDS Values, is so important, to enhance your work experience and to ensure you are well supported, both to develop your career aspirations and to maintain your wellbeing - both of which are good for you and good for the PDS as a whole. Consequently, you will recall a few weeks back we sent out an office culture survey, so LT and your local leaders can get a sense...
Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 Public Act 2019 No 21 Date of assent 31 May 2019 Commencement see section 2 Contents Page 1 Title 4 2 Commencement 4 Part 1 Purpose, preliminary provisions, eligibility, bringing claims, and case management Subpart 1—Purpose and preliminary provisions 3 Purpose 4 4 Overview of Act 4 5 Definitions 5 6 Transitional, savings, and related provisions 6 7 Act binds the Crown 7 Subpart 2—Eligibility criteria and parties to claim before trib
Hon Kris Faafoi Minister of Justice Proactive release of Cabinet papers and minutes relating to supporting the delivery of the 2020 election due to the change of election date and Covid-19 Date of issue: 22 February 2021 The following document have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) IN THE MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF HELEN ANDERSON ON BEHA
Public trust in our institutions and the law is essential to making society work effectively. We want a justice system that delivers the core results of reduced crime and improved safety, and that better meets modern public expectations of service. We also want to be transparent about what we are doing and what's being achieved. That's why this document has been created. This report is not required by any statute, but as a sector we are accountable to New Zealanders
DAVID RODKISS v CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 147 [27 August 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 147 CRC 52/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID RODKISS Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by submissions filed 21 April, 7 and 18 May 2015) Counsel: N Ironside, c
...in fact the roadway order extends as far as Mr Pere’s dwelling. [45] Mr Samuels’ argument relies on comments made during the hearing on 1 February 2008 when the Court heard the application to vary the 1984 roadway order. However, a full and careful reading of the minutes of that Court sitting confirm that the roadway order was always intended to extend over the whole of Lot 189. The discussion Mr Samuels refers to related instead to the extent to which the FNDC was prepared to t...
...Court, or by present circumstances, but simply that if one were going to change the definition of beneficiaries, what such a change would look like or entail. Counsel submitted that in articulating the direction in that way, the Chief Judge was careful to avoid having the hui deliberate the very issue that was live before him, which was whether there was a s 44 error, because it was sub judice. [22] However, counsel submitted that given Mr Johnson’s open discussion of the matter,...