LCRO 116/2019 RLF v DN (29 January 2020) [pdf, 211 KB]
...actions as BG’s (successor) attorney [43] Mr LF repeats that as a bankrupt, JL was forbidden from acting as BG’s attorney. He says in such circumstances the Family Court conferred on him “the right to be consulted” about BG’s personal care and welfare. [44] Whilst he says he appreciates the Committee having declined jurisdiction to consider Mr DN’s role as BG’s property attorney, he says difficulty of access to the Family Court should be of concern to the Committee.10...