LCRO 49/2016 QG v WW (8 May 2018) [pdf, 183 KB]
...under any enactment, Ms WW was obliged to protect Ms BA’s interest. [56] The very limited obligations Ms WW owed to Mr QG were subject to all of the foregoing and her conduct must be considered from that perspective. [57] The twins were under the protective jurisdiction of the Family Court. Orders had been made pursuant to the Care of Children Act (COCA). COCA says that “the welfare and best interests of a child in his or her particular circumstances must be the first and para...