Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 206 KB]
...Regulations and did not have the additional serious negligence finding in the overall assessment. [26] It was acknowledged by counsel that none were on all fours with the present case. We do not propose to rehearse all of the submissions helpfully and carefully advanced by both counsel in relation to these cases, save to comment on one or two. [27] We consider that the Grave8 decision is the one most comparable in terms of seriousness of offending (the need to protect a beneficiar...