5433 items matching your search terms
Legal aid full audit methodology Legal aid provider quality assurance Full Audit Methodology February 2023 Document owner: Legal Aid Provider Services Last updated: February 2023 Full Audit Methodology February 2023 Table of Contents Legal aid provider quality assurance .................................................. 1 SECTION 1 | General ....................
Legal aid full audit methodology Legal aid provider quality assurance Full Audit Methodology February 2023 Document owner: Legal Aid Provider Services Last updated: February 2023 Full Audit Methodology February 2023 Table of Contents SECTION 1 | General .........................................................................
...complaint concerning the conduct of Mr TE, a lawyer in sole practice who in August 2012 acted for Mr GL on the creation of The R GL Trust, signed by Mr GL on 1 September 2012 (the trust). [2] Mr GL, and his sister J had made a claim under the Family Protection Act 1955 against the estate of their father Mr C GL. [3] In order to resolve that claim Mr GL’s intention was that his share of the assets of his father’s trust, The C GL Trust, be resettled on his trust. Mr GL, togethe...
Environmental Protection Authority Bill 4 November 2010 ATTORNEY-GENERAL LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY BILL 1. We have considered whether the Environmental Protection Authority Bill (PCO 14588/4.1) (the “Bill”) is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the “Bill of Rights Act”). We understand that the Bill is likely to be considered by the Cabinet Legislation Committee at its meet...
...Moses, responded on 4 October 2017. Counsel acknowledged on behalf of Mr Singh that the failure to engage with his clients was a breach of the professional obligations. It was contended that the breach was inadvertent as he had not exercised due care. There was no deliberate violation of the professional standards. Mr Singh had made a genuine mistake in failing to comprehend 1 Immigration New Zealand (Gilray) v Singh [2019] NZIACDT 53....
...immigration advice, and to enhance the reputation of New Zealand as a migration destination, by providing for the regulation of persons who give immigration advice. 6 [22] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:3 …It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary proceedings for various occupations is not to...
...immigration advice, and to enhance the reputation of New Zealand as a migration destination, by providing for the regulation of persons who give immigration advice. [22] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:3 …It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary proceedings for various occupations is not to punish...
...acknowledged this is Ms Schoeller’s first appearance before the Tribunal in 11 years of practice. Caution or censure [34] The Tribunal agrees with the Registrar that the wrongdoing does not warrant censure. Ms Schoeller is cautioned to be more careful in her advice, more professional in her communications and to ensure clients are promptly sent and understand her terms of engagement. Training [35] Despite Ms Schoeller’s less than fulsome acknowledgement of her wrongdoing,...
...mother, TSV, died on 2 July 2018. [3] Mr SV was the executor of his mother’s will. 2 [4] Ms UI (Mr SV’s sister) was excluded from her mother’s will. [5] Mr FT acted for Ms UI in advancing a claim against the estate under the Family Protection Act 1955. [6] The assets of Mrs SV’s estate included a residential property (the property). [7] Mr SV was granted probate on 2 August 2019. [8] The property was transferred to Mr SV as executor on 23 August 2018. [9] On receiv...
...with updates of the non-existent application, thereby deliberately misleading the complainant. (2) Failed to provide the complainant with timely updates regarding the work visa application, in breach of cl 26(b). (3) Failed to exercise due care to ensure the residence application filed was complete, in breach of cl 1. (4) Failed to provide the complainant with timely updates regarding the residence application, in breach of cl 26(b). (5) Failed to exercise due care to fi...