Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 214 King v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...an acronym for Save Our Unique Landscape. [12] HNZPT is a statutory entity established under the HNZPTA, responsible for the administration of that Act and relevantly having among its functions :5 4 5 (c) To advocate the conservation and protection of historic places, historic areas, wahi tupuna, wahi tapu and wahi tapu areas: ... (e) To issue authorities in accordance with this Act: ... (i) To act as a heritage protection authority under Part 8 of the Resource Management Act...

2. Recommendations recap - issue 5 [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Recommendations recap covers a six-month period and includes 98 coronial cases where recommendations have been made. These findings were released by a coroner between 1 October 2012 and 31 March 2013. 1 Adverse effects or reactions to medical/surgical care 6 Aged and infirm care 9 Care facilities (other) 9 Child deaths 10 Deaths in custody 15 Drugs, alcohol or substance abuse 20 Electrocution 21 Fall 21 Fire-related 23 Mental health issues 25 Natural causes 26 Ov...

3. Restorative justice: Practice resources for family violence cases 2019 [docx, 6.8 MB]

   ...evidence-based risk factors · the adult victim’s assessment of the risk[footnoteRef:1] [1: This risk assessment work is largely drawn from the Western Australian Common Risk Assessment and Risk Management Framework (2nd ed.), Department for Child Protection and Family Support (2015). Perth, Western Australia: Western Australian Government.] [bookmark: _Hlk12959850]Case file no: Date: 1. Risk and lethality factor identification Factors marked with an asterisk (*) indicate an increa...

4. Julian v Inia - Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri (2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...(2024) 322 Waiariki MB 32 (322 WAR 32) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000024870 A20210015426 WĀHANGA Under Sections 3A and 4 Family Protection Act 1955 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri I WAENGA I A Between TUI KUIAKAHA JULIAN Te Kaitono Tuatahi First Applicant AP-20230000021564 ME And JOAN...

5. Evidence - Traffic - Minister for Children - Samantha McCarthy - Final [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...O AOTEAROA ENV-2019-AKL- 000007 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") A N D IN THE MATTER of a proposed direct referral of a notice of requirement by the Minister of Children to alter Designation 3800 ‘Care and Protection Residential Centre – Upper North’ in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) BETWEEN MINISTER FOR CHILDREN Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority EVIDENCE OF SAMANTHA LO...

6. LCRO 208/2020 & LCRO 214/2020 JA v RR and RR v JA (8 October 2021) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...unenforceable) impediment to the autonomous rights of an individual or legal entity to engage the lawyer of their choice. [48] Whilst Mr JA argues that it is necessary to impose restrictions on Mr RR’s ability to practice on grounds that he considers protective measures are required to ensure the interests of family members (particularly of his elderly mother) are protected, it is not the case that all of the family members or parties involved with the trusts were critical of Mr...

7. BORA Geneva Conventions (Third Protocol—Red Crystal Emblem) Amendment Bill [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching this conclusion we considered a potential inconsistency with s 14 (freedom of expression) of the Bill of Rights Act. PURPOSE 3. The Bill amends the Geneva Conventions Act 1958 and the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981 in order to implement New Zealand’s obligations under the Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (the Third Protocol), signed by N...

8. LCRO 243/2013 ZAA v YBC (27 June 2017) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...down for an applicant-only hearing, Mr YBC indicated that he and counsel assisting him would attend. The review hearing took place by teleconference on 11 May 2017. 26 [26] I record that, as well as hearing from the parties in person, I have carefully read the complaint and response, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of the application for review. There are no additional issues or questions which in my mind necessitate any further submissions from...

9. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Shalendra Goundar [2017] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...independent, transparent, and effective.14 [14] These purposes are best met by penalties for misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct being determined bearing in mind the need to maintain a high standard of conduct in the industry, the need for consumer protection, and the maintenance of confidence in the industry, and the need for deterrence. [15] A penalty should be appropriate for the particular nature of the misbehaviour, and the Tribunal should endeavour to maintain consistency in...

10. INZ (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...the decline of their applications, in breach of cl 26(b). (8) Allowed a visa application for one client to be lodged based on eligibility criteria which had not been assessed, in breach of the obligation in cl 1 to exercise diligence and due care; and (9) failed to assess one client’s employment agreement accurately against the relevant immigration instructions, in breach of the obligation in cl 1 to exercise diligence and due care. Second complaint [8] The second complaint...