Search Results

1. Boyd-Dunlop & Anor v CAC307 & Anor [2016] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...The transferee will not use or permit the use of any lifestyle lot for purposes other than residential purposes, without the prior written consent of the transferor whose decision shall be final and binding upon the transferee.” [9] It is not in dispute that the licensee advised the complainants about the lack of resource consent prior to their purchase. However, the complainants state that when they commented that getting resource consent should be a formality, the licensee made no c...

2. Waratah Trust v CAC 20004 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 20 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...will be strained relations between the complainant and the agent. That is because there is only a need to consider the jurisdiction because there has been some unsatisfactory conduct by the agent. (b) There will always be a possibility of further civil litigation. The High Court has confirmed that the Committee cannot order compensatory damages. Complainants are now compelled to issue civil proceedings in addition to pursuing complaints. (c) If it is inappropriate for the Committee...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 123 CSN v Royal District Nursing Service NZ Ltd [pdf, 376 KB]

   CSN v ROYAL DISTRICT NURSING SERVICE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 123 [11 July 2022] ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF PLAINTIFF AND OTHER PERSONS IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 123 EMPC 28/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration pursuant to s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN CSN Pl

4. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 62 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...in 2006. He graduated from the University of Auckland in 1989 with a BA (majoring in Māori studies) and an LLB with Honours. Upon admission to the bar in 1990 he became a staff solicitor with Kensington Swan in Auckland, practising in the areas of civil and commercial litigation and claims before the Waitangi Tribunal. In 1992 he moved to Rotorua as a staff solicitor with East Brewster, becoming a partner in 1997. His practice included both criminal and civil jurisdictions of the Distric...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 260 Tasman District Council v Awaroa Aerodrome Limited [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...assumed that the activity had existing use rights. Following its investigation the Council determined that existing use rights did not apply to the Airstrip and sought that a resource consent was obtained for its use. [7] That finding was disputed by those of the Respondents that were involved in discussions with the Council on that topic. Ultimately, the outcome was the issue by the Council of this application for enforcement orders which is more fully described in paragraphs...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 136 Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...not comply with the vaccination order. In these circumstances the parties accept that sch 3A cl 3 permitted Jetconnect to terminate his employment agreement by providing him three months’ paid notice under the CEA. [39] However, the parties dispute whether Jetconnect complied with the obligation under sch 3A cl 3(4), which required Jetconnect, before giving notice, to “ensure that all other reasonable alternatives that would not lead to termination… have been exhausted”....

7. FZ v UL LCRO 257 / 2010 (17 October 2011) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...first two until he made demand for a statement which was finally provided in October 2008. [69] In addition, the pattern of payments made into the trust account would support an inference that bills had not been provided. [70] UL does not dispute that his fees would have been deducted at the time they were prepared. To do so without providing the bills to the client constitutes a breach of regulation 8 (2) of the Trust Account Regulations 1998. [71] In addition, Rule 5 (8)...

8. BORA Court Matters Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...or cause a serious risk of violence on court premises. Such behaviour disrupts the safe, secure and orderly operation of the courts and increases the stress experienced by other court users (including potentially vulnerable uses such as parties to civil or family proceedings, and jurors, victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings). This is a legitimate objective. The threshold for a refusal to enter or removal is not low (e.g. a significant disruption), and the re-entry provision wo...

9. He Hīnātore ki te Ao Māori: A glimpse into the Māori world [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   He Hïnätore ki te Ao Mäori A Glimpse into the Mäori World Mäori Perspectives on Justice First published in March 2001 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ���Crown Copyright ISSN 0-478-50156-7 i Acknowledgements E ngä mana, e ngä reo, e ngä karangatanga maha. Tënä koutou, tënä koutou, tënä koutou. Kai te mihi atu, kai te tangi atu, ki te iti, ki te rahi, kua wehe ake ki te pö mai i tënä whäruarua, i tënä whäruarua awhio atu i

10. Murray v Parker - Paihia 3B9B Residue [2018] Chief Judges MB 707 (2018 CJ 707) [pdf, 346 KB]

    ...Kaitaia MB 24 (28 KT 24) dated 24 March 2009. 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 715 Discussion [14] Those who support the applicant, Rex Murray, include his uncle who is a brother and sole surviving sibling of Glass Murray and a number of extended family members. Rex Murray was represented by Ms Prendergast. [15] Those who opposed the application and the report of the Registrar were Tania Parker, James Murray, Raymond Murray and Caroline Murray. They are all siblings and are some...