Search Results

1. O v CAC 10028 & T [2011] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...para 42). [50] Against the public interest must be taken into account the private interests of Mr O. These have been identified by his Counsel and in the affidavits he and his wife filed as the fear of shame to Mr O and Mrs O and her extended family if his name is published, damage to Mr O’s reputation, and to Mr and Mrs O’s general mental health. [51] The Tribunal considers that in most circumstances it will be proper for the Tribunal to order the publication of the name of a...

2. BORA End of Life Choices Bill section 7 report [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...fundamental justice, the objective of the law has to be one that is legitimate in the sense that it could reasonably justify some limit on the right not to be deprived of life. Those cases concerned the laws prohibiting assisted dying. Few would dispute that the objective of such laws could reasonably justify some limit on the right, and it is therefore possible that it was not specifically addressed because it was not at issue. 49. My preliminary view is that it is inherent in t...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 12 - TSO v Essina (27 February 2020) - Sanctions [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...waiting for the Tribunal’s decision. According to Ms Essina, she had developed some medical issues which did not allow her to work productively. When the pain became unbearable, she took some days off work. She was the only breadwinner in the family as her husband was retired. Ms Essina requested the Tribunal to direct a lesser amount of reparation. 6 [30] Additionally, Ms Essina requested name suppression. Her business reputation was important. She was concerned she mi...

4. Paamu - Succession to Tupito Maruera [2025] Chief Judge's MB 1321 (2025 CJ 1321) [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...of Maihi Te Puaha Maruera, but rather he was the son of his brother, Tupito. [15] The whānau understanding is very clear in that Tupito did have a child - that being Nohotia. As Jolene Rio explained, this is a matter which has been with this family for some time and they had previously asked an uncle, Maihi and their father (need to find out who their father is) to rectify the situation. Sadly, they have passed away. Things are made more complex in that as Jolene stated: …...

5. Willson v CAC301 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 90 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...(one of the vendors) who accepted it. The licensee then arranged for that offer to be sent to the other trustee, a Mr Bridge, who signed and returned it the following day. [14] Between 8 and 10 October 2012, the licensee made arrangements for his family and himself to travel to Gisborne for his brother’s funeral. [15] On 9 October 2012, public meetings were held regarding the proposed Mangatahi mine. Mr Wadams (one of the vendors) attended the noon on-site meeting. [16] On 10...

6. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Attorney-General [2020] NZHRRT 45 [pdf, 626 KB]

   ...credit with G E Money. The Tribunal, in considering the degree of care required to check information under IPP 8, said: [44] In legal proceedings there is opportunity to challenge the claim before a court or tribunal skilled in the adjudication of disputes and bound by the rules of fairness. At a minimum a hearing of the dispute can be required. None of these protections apply when a credit reporting agency provides a credit rating. The request for a credit rating and the response oc...

7. LCRO 228/2016 SP v QH (27 June 2019) [pdf, 324 KB]

   LCRO 228/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SP Applicant AND QH Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms SP has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area]] Standards Committee 2 (the Committee) that

8. OIA-109347.pdf [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...associated documents for easy access). • Understand and accurately apply the correct protocols required to support the over 90 transcription types relevant to the following areas: o High Court / District Court Criminal. o High Court / District Court Civil. o Family Court. o Youth Court. o Environment Court. o Employment Court. o Coroner’s Court. o Maori Land Court. o Supreme Court. o Waitangi Tribunals. o Other Sector Agencies (e.g. Parole Board). o Other Speciali...

9. Beniston v Subritzky - Estate of Huhana Subritzky [2016] Chief Judge's MB 178 (2016 CJ 178) [pdf, 366 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 178 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130010573 CJ 2013/32 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Huhana Subritzky, deceased MARIA MAY BENISTON Applicant ROSALEEN ALISON SUBRITZKY DONNA ROCHELLE GREER-SUBRITZKY Respondents WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Affected Party Hearing: Appearances: 5 November 2015 at 2015 Chief Judge's MB 845-

10. Toia v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2018] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 299 KB]

    ...complaint must first have been considered by the Privacy Commissioner as a complaint. See L v T (1998) 5 HRNZ 30 (Morris J, A Knowles, GDS Taylor) at 35 and 36; Steele v Department of Work and Income [2002] NZHRRT 12; DAS v Department of Child, Youth and Family Services [2004] NZHRRT 45; Lehmann v Radio Works [2005] NZHRRT 20 and more recently Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand [2013] NZHRRT 10. [66] The importance of hearing the agency in relation to the action alleged to...