1458 items matching your search terms
LCRO 172/2015 173/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN WL Applicant AND XC Respondent AND BETWEEN HF Applicant AND XC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms WL and Mr HF have
...herself from the real estate industry and will not return. [59] Counsel contends there are appropriate grounds for suppression of the name of Ms Tafilipepe and her agency, which we discuss later. A medical report (4 August 2024) from Dr Xu, family doctor for Ms Tafilipepe and her children, has been produced in support. DISCUSSION [60] Mr Smith submits that Ms Tafilipepe’s conduct does not fall into the “disgraceful” level of conduct. This is surprising given his clie...
...Auckland University School of Medicine both of whom gave evidence before the Tribunal as did CPAG’s director, Janfrie Wakim. [9] The present complaint is one of a number of claims pursued by CPAG since 2002 challenging forms of State assistance to families with children that are unavailable to families whose parents are in receipt of benefits on the basis of discrimination. [Footnote citations omitted] [58.2] IDEA Services Ltd v Attorney-General [2011] NZHRRT 11. At [7] and [8]...
...recording history. They would remind people about ancestors or events from many years ago. The land was not owned by a single person. It had to be shared among the many relatives. People had to respect the land and respect each other. Whanau, extended families, would often combine and build a kainga. Suitable land for cultivations and food gathering would usually be nearby. However children and their whanau did not live in one kainga all year round. Whanau would move around to harv...
RA N G A H A U A WH A N U I DI S T R I C T 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON PA R T I I OC T O B E R 1996 WO R K I N G PA P E R : FI R S T RE L E A S E WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11b: Hawke’s Bay, D Cowi
...[2007] New Zealand Law Review 631, at 652. 23 s 80 of the 1964 Act re-enacted in cl 58 of the Bill. 24 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. other entities that deliver education, rather than students or their families. These provisions are necessary for the efficient and effective operation of the education sector and are clearly justified. 34. The Bill also contains provisions restricting the use of specified terms. Clause 528(1)(b) re-enacts the...
2 Final Report [image: Independent Electoral Review Logo] He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Final Report Our recommendations for a fairer, clearer, and more accessible electoral system November 2023 This report may be cited as: Independent Electoral Review, 2023. Final Report: Our Recommendations for a Fairer, Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) [image:
...priorities. These help us deliver on our purpose and move towards our long-term aspirations. OUR TRANSFORMATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Working together for a fair and safe Aotearoa Leading the transformation of the criminal justice system Addressing family violence and sexual violence Improving access to justice Honouring our responsibilities to Māori Providing sector leadership and policy stewardship Maintaining the integrity of the courts and tribunals Making the...
Regulatory Impact Statement | 1 Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Consultation options for adoption law reform Quality Assurance (completed by QA panel) Reviewing Agency/Agencies: Ministry of Justice Panel Assessment & Comment: The Ministry of Justice's RIA QA panel has reviewed the Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: A New Adoption System for New Zealand (Interim RIS) prepared by the Ministry of Justice and considers that the information and analysis s
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 110 Ref: LCRO 95/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HC Applicant AND RB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, M