1457 items matching your search terms
Evaluation of the Court-Referred Restorative Justice Pilot: Case Studies Prepared by the Crime and Justice Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington May 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the former Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
...the Applicant intended to sell. The Agreement was completed by the Applicant and the purchaser. It presented as a sale of the entire business. The Applicant said nothing to the Respondent to indicate otherwise. There was nothing other than the disputed telephone conversation concerning the telephone numbers which would have indicated to the Respondent that the sale was anything other than a sale of a business in the usual way. To achieve what the Applicant intended would have requir...
...and content of the application and supporting affidavit (which Mr SO describes as necessitating ‘technical discussions’2) Probate was granted on 13 November 2020. [6] Mrs EJ says that the value of the Estate was approximately $30,000.3 Mr SO disputes Mrs EJ’s assessment – he says the value was ‘just under $400,000’.4 [7] A Legal Executive in the firm (Ms IG) was assigned to assist with the administration of the Estate. [8] Given the delay in obtaining the Grant of Probate...
...pull finger out their asses and to intervene. They need to act NOW and are messing around … The LinkedIn community and most of the names of people that like and comment, they are all dumbarses and most of them I have dealt with in employment disputes. Reading, writing, comprehension, it is all out of the window with all of them. Catherine Stewart Lawyers took advantage of Nathan Corrigan, they exploited him, and have now dropkicked him. There is currently an application t...
LCRO 106/2018 LCRO 107/2018 LCRO 170/2018 LCRO 181/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN SY, [SAL] and DT Applicants AND [AREA] STANDARDS COMMITTEE [X] Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms SY, Mr DT and
...that since her last letter to management there had been further incidents of unprofessional/unethical behaviour by Mrs Parata and following her first complaint she had been led to believe that things would change. She said there was a veneer of civility now but the environment essentially remained the same. She then set out 19 examples of behaviour which she found unacceptable. [47] The letter concluded: It is probably true to say that every person who has worked in the unit i...
...the suffering of ‘the greatest wrongs and most severe injuries’. Thirdly, it considered that any significant colonisation would from its unavoidable tendency . . . interrupt, if not defeat, those measures for the religious Improvement and Civilization of the Natives of New Zealand which are now in favourable progress through the labours of the Missionaries.12 But neither was the association guaranteed a warm reception from the Government. The Colonial Office was already overstr...
claim-01505.doc Claim No: 1505 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim And Peter Bruce Frederick Atkins, Peter Bruce Frederick Atkins and John Richard Muller as trustees of The Bruce Family Trust Claimants And North Shore City Council First respondent And Grant Williams Second respondent And Jason Williams Third respondent And Grant Williams and Jason Williams and Desmond Sarjant Williams as trustee
AVIATION AND MARINE ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION INC v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC [4 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 172 ARC 87/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AVIATION AND MARINE ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION INC Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant ARC 90/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determina
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Andrew Little Minister of Justice Proactive release – New Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Date of issue: 20 August 2020 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. No. Document Comments 1 New Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment Cabinet Paper Office of the Minister o