Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 122 Lee Valley Limestone v Tasman District Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   ...property (Lot 1 DP349243) west of SH 60 comprising 11.6 ha is to be amalgamated with Lot 1 DP305843 on the eastern side of the highway. A new title will issue for proposed Lot 2 (18.4 ha) being the site and this will contain the quarry. There was no dispute that the proposed subdivision would not cause any adverse environmental effects and was consistent with the relevant planning provisions of the Tasman Resource Management Plan (TRMP). [6] Under s 106 RMA (pre 17 October 2017) we...

2. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

3. [2020] NZIACDT 34 ZT v Li (20 July 2020) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...email to the officer on 8 January 2017 with information she hoped would assist his understanding. She set out the history since approval in principle. The only issue that had been raised by a former officer concerned the transfer of funds using a family member’s quota. She fully understood that the complainant was given only one year “for transferring fund” and it could be extended by only six months. It was partly because of the agency’s lengthy processing time that he ha...

4. Hill - Otakanini Māori Reservation (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 76 (108 TTK 76) [pdf, 423 KB]

   ...interests from the estate of her half-sister Moehau when she was not entitled to do so. Mrs Povey argued that Kapu promised to return these lands but instead transferred them to her son, Glen Wilcox. Mrs Povey contends that Chris Passell and his family have suffered significant loss as a result. [60] Chris Passell did not give evidence in this proceeding. There were no court records or other documents filed which support the allegations made by Mrs Povey. Mrs Povey did not even...

5. Roos v Wang [2010] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 288 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2009-100-000053 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 10 BETWEEN CHARLES and HELEN MARIE ROOS Claimants AND THOMAS GANG WANG First Respondent AND FU HAO CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Second Respondent AND ADRIAN ROSS KIFF Third Respondent AND BAYS HOUSE INSPECTION SERVICES LIMITED Fourth Respondent Hearing: 2 February 2010 Final Submissions received: 26 February 2010 Appearances: Ms L Gerrard, Counsel for the Claimants. Mr

6. OIA-121693.pdf [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 23 June 2025 Ref: OIA 121693 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Non-violence programmes Thank you for your email of 29 April 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), further information regarding non-violence programmes (NVPs). Specifically, yo

7. Tuson - Mangamuka West 3B2A (2018) 168 Taitokerau MB 17 (168 TTK 17) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   168 Taitokerau MB 17 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130006483 UNDER Section 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangamuka West 3B2A Block BETWEEN NGAWAI TUSON Applicant Hearing: 20 November 2013 17 November 2014 4 May 2015 (Heard at Kaitaia) Judgment: 23 February 2018 PRELIMINARY DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE FOX 1

8. Maori Trustee v Hanford - Ohiro 19 and 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) (2006) 165 Aotea MB 131 (165 AOT 131) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...distinct periods. At the conclusion of the direction I confirmed that Mr Bennion was appointed counsel to represent the objectors with his costs being met from the Special Aid Fund, subject to confinnation by the Court of an appropriate estimate at civil legal aid rates. Minute Book: 165 AOT 135 [7] Public notice of the hearing was arranged by the applicant in accordance with the Court's direction. The notice made it plain that an exchange order per section 310 and a status...

9. LCRO 162/2018 BQ v XR (29 September 2020) [pdf, 267 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 182 LCRO 162/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN BQ Applicant AND XR Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr BQ has applied for

10. NT v Parker [2019] NZIACDT 62 (4 September 2019) [pdf, 289 KB]

    ...meeting and gave the notes to her, along with other documents. Mr Parker’s version of their initial contact is consistent with the contemporary documents. [111] I discount the café meeting on 12 March 2017. It was a social visit. The Parker family had lunch. Any discussion with the complainant, who was apparently on duty in the kitchen, may have been brief and could easily be overlooked by the complainant as having any relevance to her professional contact with Mr Parker. [1...