LCRO 224/2020 & LCRO 230/2020 EZ v MQ and MQ v EZ (19 May 2021) [pdf, 181 KB]
...relating to her engagement with Mr EZ in her capacity as a lawyer, she submitted that: (a) she had acted for Mr EZ solely in respect to immigration matters; and (b) she did not have access to any sensitive information pertaining to Mr EZ’s family members; and 4 (c) she had offered to become involved in discussions between Mr EZ and his employer as she was concerned that the employment issues may compromise Mr EZ’s application for a work visa; and (d) she had not acted in...