Search Results

1. HRRT-Position-description-Deputy-Chair-2022 [docx, 25 KB]

   ...good judgment, integrity, impartiality and leadership. Ability to perform the functions of a Deputy Chairperson of the Tribunal. · Demonstrated ability to conduct adversarial hearings, ideally including experience with lay litigants · Experience in civil litigation and civil case management. · Knowledge of the Privacy Act 1993, the Privacy Act 2020, Human Rights Act 1993, the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 and general human rights law (including the New Zealand Bill of Rights...

2. HRRT-Position-description-Deputy-Chair-1December 2022 [docx, 25 KB]

   ...good judgment, integrity, impartiality and leadership. Ability to perform the functions of a Deputy Chairperson of the Tribunal. · Demonstrated ability to conduct adversarial hearings, ideally including experience with lay litigants · Experience in civil litigation and civil case management. · Knowledge of the Privacy Act 1993, the Privacy Act 2020, Human Rights Act 1993, the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 and general human rights law (including the New Zealand Bill of Rights...

3. LCRO 213/2017 AA v BB and CC (26 April 2018) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms AA has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) which, having found that she charged Mr BB and Ms CC excessive fees: (a) made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct; (b) ordered a fee reduction and refund; and (c) imposed a fine and costs. Background [2] In 2016, Ms AA acted for Mr BB and Ms CC (the clients) when they purchased a house at...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 47 - Labour Insp.Gardiner v Jaspal (11 September 2025) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...Documentation and verification (payable before 10/12/2022) INR 220,000 Lodgement (payable before lodgement) INR 222,500 [12] The client and Mr Jaspal exchanged text messages between about 17 December 2022 and 14 January 2023 concerning payment of the fees. There is evidence of the payment of INR 220,000 and INR 222,500 to Mr Jaspal. 4 [13] A work visa application for the complainant was lodged by Mr Jaspal with Immigration NZ on 12 January 2023. It was based on employment wi...

5. [2021] NZIACDT 16 - EM v Yong (13 July 2021) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...crippled her objective of successfully migrating and being with her husband. [11] Kitson treated the client’s communication of 14 June 2019 as a notice to terminate its services, following which it refunded RM 2,430.12 (being 30 per cent of the fee) on 11 July 2019. Decision of the Tribunal [12] The Tribunal noted that it was not disputed that Mr Yong had failed to personally engage with either the client or her husband. His business practice was to permit his unlicensed...

6. LASDP - Application for a licence by an individual [pdf, 666 KB]

   ...Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS • Use a black pen or blue pen if printing the form out to complete • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information The prescribed application fee is $528. To confirm how you pay the application fee, please visit the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/licences-certificates/ secondhand-dealers-pawnbrokers/forms-and-fees/ If you need further assistance, the...

7. BORA Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Bill [pdf, 616 KB]

   ...Consultation draft 15 Pa11 2 cl 33 Canterbu ry Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Bill (d) a person employed or engaged by the department: (e) a person who assists the mediator or a party. (3) A med iator m ust not give evidence in any civil proceed ings, whether under th is Act or any other Act, about- (a) the med iation services provided by the med iator; or (b) anything related to those services that comes to the med iator's know­ ledge in the course of p...

8. LCRO 162/2015 and 66/2016 IA v CMR (31 July 2017) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr IA has applied for reviews of two decisions by the [City] Standards Committee [X] arising from a complaint concerning his conduct and fees. The Committee concluded there had been unsatisfactory conduct on Mr IA’s part, and then ordered publication of his name in the context of the first decision. Procedural history [2] This review traverses issues that have been...

9. Singh v Golian [2019] NZIACDT 9 (19 February 2019) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...immigration instructions. Such a request is discretionary and the Minister is not required to give reasons, so it is not an ideal approach if there are other alternatives. [4] Mr Singh proposed to apply under s 61. He had already paid tuition fees at an education institution in order to enrol in a national diploma. Mr Golian recommended to Mr Singh that he should withdraw from the course, submit a formal complaint to Immigration New Zealand regarding the decline of his work visa a...

10. WE v AW & AX LCRO 82 / 2012 (10 June 2013) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...Committee BETWEEN MR WE Applicant AND MR AW AND MR AX Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr WE’s complaint primarily concerned the fees charged to him by Mr AW and Mr AX. Mr AX is a barrister who was instructed by Mr AW. Prior to the review hearing, Mr AX and Mr WE settled the complaint about Mr AX’s fees, and Mr WE’s complaint about Mr AW’s fees was settl...