Search Results

1. 2019 Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...control, air traffic management and navigation services in New Zealand’s flight information region. • Air traffic control: This is primarily the separation of aircraft in flight, to standards determined by the appropriate regulatory authority (the Civil Aviation Authority in New Zealand). • Air traffic management: This is the management of aircraft in flight to maximise access to the most efficient flight paths as determined by the customer, limited only by the constraints o...

2. LCRO 34/2023 PI v SY (27 June 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...2021. The invoice was rendered in the sum of $20,000 plus GST. [16] Mr PI responded to the invoice with immediate complaint that Mr SY had failed to competently represent him. Mr PI informed Mr SY that if he did not receive a full refund of all fees paid, a complaint would be filed with the New Zealand Law Society. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [17] Mr PI lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 23 September 2021. The sub...

3. Packer v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on appeal) [2023] NZACC 214 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...(b) band B, if a normal amount of time for the particular step is considered reasonable; or (c) band C, if a comparatively large amount of time is considered reasonable. [15] Schedule 4 provides for the time allocations for each step in general civil proceedings, according to categories A, B and C. [16] Rule 14.12(2) provides that a disbursement may only be included in a costs award to the extent that the disbursement was approved by the Court for the purposes of the proceeding,...

4. [2022] NZIACDT 15 - BC v Lawlor (29 June 2022) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...response, so the work to residence visa was declined on 27 August 2019. Mr Lawlor then filed a reconsideration application on 10 September 2019, but did not ensure that payment of Immigration NZ’s 1 BC v Lawlor [2022] NZIACDT 10. 3 fee was made. It was declined on 26 September 2019, as the fee had not been paid. Mr Lawlor then made two requests for a visa under s 61 of the Immigration Act 2009, but these were unsuccessful. [10] In respect of the complainant’s fat...

5. Rātima v Sullivan - Tataraakina C (2019) 79 Tākitimu MB 103 (79 TKT 103) [pdf, 488 KB]

   ................................................................................................................................ [10] Discussion .......................................................................................................................... [11] Should the former trustees repay any fees and travel costs? ........................................ [15] Submissions for Henare Rātima ........................................................................................

6. [2022] NZEnvC 085 Lee & Rochwalski v Buller District Council [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...Objectors’ memorandum ‘Response to Minute of the Environment Court re proposed witnesses’ dated 1 April 2020 at p 3. [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] 15 processes (particularly where there has been a dispute over the payment of his fees (assuming fees were actually incurred)). Helen Graham Ms Graham is the regulatory team leader at Taumata Arowai. Taumata Arowai is the water services regulator. The reasons provided for the summons follow:37 Taumata Arowai...

7. Hulton Patchell Limited v Mitchell - Pukeroa Oruawhata Trust (2010) 5 Waiariki MB 246 (5 WAR 246) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...formal applications for variation of trust. As I have mentioned during the course of our hearing today, that is precisely what occurred when earlier variations to the trust order took place, concerning the rotation of trustees, increase in trustees’ fees and the issue of mandate. It is only where the trustees, or the owners, through the review provisions of section 231, propose a variation that offends trust and general law principles, or indeed may even offend tikanga Mäori, that the...

8. [2021] NZIACDT 26 - RH v Ji - Sanctions (23 December 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...The Tribunal should safeguard the public interest. She does not want anyone to be the next victim of Mr Ji. [21] The complainant demands a refund of the $2,000 paid to Mr Ji through [Company]. In addition, she demands compensation: Legal fees $9,372.50 Further legal fees $625.03 6 Labour costs $5,670.00 Lost wages $45,745.00 Lost reputation/credibility with Immigration NZ $5,000.00 [22] An explanation for these losses and expenses was provided by the complainant:...

9. MG v Hu [2019] NZIACDT 33 (17 May 2019) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...2012, she entered into a form of conditional contract of purchase with Ms H. It was agreed that Ms H would be responsible for ensuring that the complainant’s long-term business visa (LTBV) was obtained and for paying the immigration adviser’s fee. [5] In about December 2012, Ms Hu was formally instructed by the complainant, with Ms H acting as an intermediary. A written agreement for the supply of professional services was entered into between the complainant and Ms Hu on...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 52 - TBE v Proudman (4 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...the payment of all or any of the costs or expenses of the investigation, inquiry, or hearing, or any related prosecution: (h) an order directing the licensed immigration adviser or former licensed immigration adviser to refund all or any part of fees or expenses paid by the complainant or another person to the licensed immigration adviser or former licensed immigration adviser: (i) an order directing the licensed immigration adviser or former licensed immigration adviser to pay re...