Search Results

1. INZ (Calder) v Wong [2019] NZIACDT 55 (5 August 2019) sanctions [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...providing for the regulation of persons who give immigration advice. [21] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:3 …It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary 3 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [15...

2. [2025] NZLCDT 26 Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Jindal (8 May 2025) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...restrictive intervention, is his degree of insight into his wrongdoing and what led to it. [20] Mr Jindal stated to the Tribunal that while he recognised he had “made a big judgement error”, it had all started with his inability to pay $999 (the fee owed to Mr Y). That is what he perceived to be the source of his current troubles. [21] Although he was able to articulate advice that he would give to clients about proportionality in pursuing litigation, Mr Jindal does not appea...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 69 A Labour Inspector v Sampan Restaurant Ltd [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...AP 53/03, 13 November 2003. 15 R v Wattle Gully Gold Mine [1980] VR 622 (SC). 2003, Baragwanath J) (unlawful hunting — company and M sentenced to fines totalling $11,000 for offences against the Wild Animal Control Act 1977 and the Civil Aviation Regulations — penalty appropriate in interests of deterrence). Wattle Gully Gold Mine (above) and East Bay Heli Services (above) were considered in Moir Farms (Maimai) Ltd v Department of Conservation [2011] NZAR 694 (H...

4. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...turn now to consider two preliminary issues which have bearing on our consideration of the charges. Are the decisions of the TT and the [court] admissible in the Tribunal? Submissions [36] Section 50 of the Evidence Act 2006 provides: 50 Civil judgment as evidence in civil or criminal proceedings (1) Evidence of a judgment or a finding of fact in a civil proceeding is not admissible in a criminal proceeding or another civil proceeding to prove the existence of a fact that was in...

5. 19 June 2020 Updated FC Caseflow Management Practice Note [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   Family Court Caseflow Management Practice Note Family Court Caseflow Management Practice Note March 2011 i INTRODUCTION Many changes in family law have occurred since the first comprehensive Family Court Caseflow Management Practice Note was published in 1998. This revised Practice Note is designed to update that document in light of a number of legislative and practice changes that have taken place since that time. The Care of Children Act 2004 brough

6. AMLCFT Statutory Review Consultation Document [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   - Review of the AML/CFT Act Consultation Document Ministry of Justice October 2021 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be con

7. Memorandum of Counsel for Wellington International Airport Limited (dated 07 May 2018) [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...Limited (WIAL) in response to the Nineteenth Minute of the Environment G[}urt dated 20 April 2018. 2 This directed WIAL to (in summary); (a) advise the Court when its recommendation for RESA approval Was lodged with the Director General of Civil Aviation and if later thall 30 April 2018 to provido reasons for the delay and the anticipated date of lodgement; alld (b) provide a copy of its RESA recommendation without any need to provide supporting technical reports provided the...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 147 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...admissible. [10] Finally, the Authority made a further upward adjustment of $200 for costs in respect of preparation of the costs memoranda, and it ordered a total contribution towards costs of $6,710 together with disbursements comprised of the filing fee, $71.56, and the hearing fee of $306.66. 4 PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC). 5 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd, above n 3, at [13]. 6 Just...

9. [2023] NZIACDT 23 – ED v Dai (11 August 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Mr Dai would assist them with multiple visa applications, starting with an English language student visa for the complainant, a visitor visa for her husband and a student visa for their child. Later, there would be work visa applications. The fee was $9,200 (incl. GST). [12] On 9 July 2019, JC Migration issued an invoice for $6,900 to the complainant and her husband, which they paid that day. [13] On the same day, a WeChat group was set up by FN comprising FN, EI, Mr Dai, TY,...

10. Skipper v Gibson - Ngāti Tawhirikura Hapū Charitable Trust (2025) 498 Aotea MB 148 (498 AOT 148) [pdf, 415 KB]

    498 Aotea MB 148 Skipper v Gibson - Ngāti Tawhirikura Hapū Charitable Trust (2025) 498 Aotea MB 148 (498 AOT 148) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20240000013666 WĀHANGA Under Sections 67, 236, 237, 238 and 240 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Ngāti Tawhirikura Hapū Charitable Trust I WAENGA I A Between GLEN SKIPPER, RANGI KIPA, TAR