Search Results

1. LCRO 42/2018 MF v Standards Committee (10 October 2018) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...[MF] it is apparent that the forms referred to comprised the applications completed by the purchasers in late August and the fresh (identical save for their date) letters of certification from Ms [MF] dated 3 October 2016. 5 Our professional fee since taking instructions on 26 August 2016 to 31 October 2016 regarding withdrawal of ASB bank KiwiSaver, assisting you in the completion of the forms, discussing timeframe, requesting a signed a copy of the sale and purchase agreement, atte...

2. LCRO 149/2023 HV v BQ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 401 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 024 Ref: LCRO 149/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HV Applicant AND BQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant ha

3. Li v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC), Huang, Chae, Donkin and Barfoot & Thompson Ltd (Mairangi Bay) [2018] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 335 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 52 READT 041/17 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Act BETWEEN RUNFANG LI Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC ) First Respondent AND HUA HUANG, Second Respondent AND KYUNG SUN CHAE, Third Respondent AND EMMA DONKIN Fourth Respondent AND BARFOOT & THOMPSON LTD (MAIRANGI BAY) Fifth Respondent Hearing: 2 Augus

4. LCRO 8/2020 PA v ZN (21 December 2022) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...pressure of time and addressing a matter which was of no relevance to the issues then before the High Court, Mr PA did no more than overlook the fact that, for a period of some three days a month short of two years earlier, he had – without charging a fee – helped Mr ZN out when an urgent need arose for Mr ZN to lodge an appeal to the High Court. This was in relation to Family Court proceedings in which Mr PA had not been, and would not thereafter be, otherwise involved. [20] In hi...

5. Welcome Guide Information for court and tribunal interpreters v2.pdf [docx, 1.7 MB]

   ...any question prior to the hearing you should ask the court or tribunal staff. [bookmark: _Toc129260326]Arrive on time Please arrive at least 15 minutes before the hearing is scheduled to begin. You can claim the 15 minutes as part of your interpreting fees. You also need to ensure that you return from breaks on time. [bookmark: _Toc129260327]What to wear You should wear formal clothes when working in courts and tribunals – this means tidy business clothes such as pants or skirts, a blazer...

6. Welcome Guide Information for court and tribunal interpreters v6 [docx, 1.7 MB]

   ...any question prior to the hearing you should ask the court or tribunal staff. [bookmark: _Toc129260326]Arrive on time Please arrive at least 15 minutes before the hearing is scheduled to begin. You can claim the 15 minutes as part of your interpreting fees. You also need to ensure that you return from breaks on time. [bookmark: _Toc129260327]What to wear You should wear formal clothes when working in courts and tribunals – this means tidy business clothes such as pants or skirts, a blazer...

7. Welcome-Guide-Information-for-court-and-tribunal-interpreters-v5.docx [docx, 1.7 MB]

   ...any question prior to the hearing you should ask the court or tribunal staff. [bookmark: _Toc129260326]Arrive on time Please arrive at least 15 minutes before the hearing is scheduled to begin. You can claim the 15 minutes as part of your interpreting fees. You also need to ensure that you return from breaks on time. [bookmark: _Toc129260327]What to wear You should wear formal clothes when working in courts and tribunals – this means tidy business clothes such as pants or skirts, a blazer...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 213 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education Interlocutory (No 5) [pdf, 336 KB]

   KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v MINISTER OF EDUCATION [2024] NZEmpC 213 [6 November 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 213 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 25/2014 ARC 48/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of execution BETWEEN KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE First Plaintiff

9. Widdowson v Bekx [pdf, 166 KB]

   FILE NO: 0092 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: DAVID JOHN WIDDOWSON & ANGELA PHYLLIS WIDDOWSON Claimant AND: PETER FRANCES BEKX First Respondent AND: DEBBIE ANNE BEKX Second Respondent AND: WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND IAN M STUART Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND STUDORP LTD Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATORS

10. OIA-99080.pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

    ...mentality within the profession impeding on early case disposal Academics Anleu & Mack (2009), suggest adjournment creates a unique opportunity outside the court room for dispute resolution. However, Hansen (1998) believes, from evaluating the civil case management model, that the system is significantly influenced by resourcing levels. Resourcing levels do not seem to support the “front loading” nature of case management under the CPA ultimately hindering dispute resolution and...