4427 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 40 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 READT 025/2020 BETWEEN STEPHEN GEORGE WILLIAM BEATH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND MIKE PERO REAL ESTATE LTD Second Respondent READT 033/2020 BETWEEN STEPHEN GEORGE WILLIAM BEATH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHO
FIRST UNION INC v JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 [17 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 EMPC 175/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FIRST UNION INC Plaintiff AND JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL Defendant
...Tao and Mr Cao initially intended to undertake remedial work prior to proceedings for adjudication. However they have been unable to afford this and have based their claim on the estimated cost of remedial work of $622,275 including professional fees and consent fees. [3] The claimants allege that the Auckland City Council, Brian William Newth, Tony Tay and Selina Tay are responsible for the defects in resulting damage. The Auckland City Council was the territorial author...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 26 LCDT 008/12 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 Applicant AND FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU of Auckland, Lawyer CHAIR Ms M Scholtens QC MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Hughes QC Ms J Gray Mr W Smith Mr P Shaw HEARING at Auckland DATE 30 September – 9 October, 10 December 2015 (with LCDT 010/10) DATE OF DECISION 15 September 2016 APPEARANCES Mr
...to the transaction generally. We have observed above that Mr Lee seemed to have undertaken all necessary steps or, certainly, he and Mr Robinson between them did. [90] Ms Cunninghame also observed that, if we had power to award costs as does a civil Court, she would have sought costs against the appellants should the licensee be successful. We do not currently have such power and can only, in appropriate circumstances, order costs against a licensee. [91] The overall submission fo...
...damages should be followed in this case and general damages are set at $25,000. [87] Consequential losses are claimed in the sum of $30,329.85. These represent the costs of temporary rental accommodation, storage and moving costs, valuation fees, insurance and expert‟s fees. Invoices to support these claims were produced. No challenge was made to the sum claimed. It is accepted that this claim is made out. Conclusion as to Quantum [88] The claim has been es...
...information concerning the reasons why certain trespass notices were issued and declining the requests for information under s 18(h) of the Official Information Act and s 29(1)(j) of the Privacy Act 1993. [43.15] Photocopy of page taken from New Zealand Civil Rights Handbook [44] In summary, the statement of claim filed by Mr Brown on 11 July 2016 is best described as a sparse document as far as content is concerned. It does not briefly and clearly state the facts giving rise to Mr Bro...
...undertaking their work for the direct benefit of the Overseeing Shepherd or any of his subordinate leadership group, or that it was directed at a perceived communal good. There are, as Mr Kirkness pointed out, analogies with the work undertaken by civil servants, employed to benefit the community they serve rather than the specific organ that signs the employment agreement and pays their wages. Rather it can be said that the state organ is the employer because it has ultimate responsibili...
...deponent. [10] On 25 March 2025, Mr Anderson filed a further application which appeared to be a separate challenge to an objection to disclosure. It was titled as an amended version of the application for non-party disclosure. Mistakenly no filing fee was paid and there was no evidence of service on the first defendant. 2 Barbara v Turnbull (1999) 13 PRNZ 166 (HC). [11] On 7 April 2025, Ms Stewart filed a notice of opposition to the application for non-party disco...
...[2021] NZHRRT 48 Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 28 Fisher v Foster (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 29 Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2016] NZHRRT 36 Costs – principles to be applied – whether Tribunal to depart from civil rule that costs follow the event – whether costs discretion must promote, not negate objects of Human Rights Act 1993 – whether discretion to be exercised in a way which may discourage individuals from bringing proceedings – plaintiff f...