4560 items matching your search terms
FILE NO: 0092 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: DAVID JOHN WIDDOWSON & ANGELA PHYLLIS WIDDOWSON Claimant AND: PETER FRANCES BEKX First Respondent AND: DEBBIE ANNE BEKX Second Respondent AND: WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND IAN M STUART Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND STUDORP LTD Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATORS
...mentality within the profession impeding on early case disposal Academics Anleu & Mack (2009), suggest adjournment creates a unique opportunity outside the court room for dispute resolution. However, Hansen (1998) believes, from evaluating the civil case management model, that the system is significantly influenced by resourcing levels. Resourcing levels do not seem to support the “front loading” nature of case management under the CPA ultimately hindering dispute resolution and...
...claim from any of the liable parties. [42] Mr Pope’s costs assessment for the difference between the weatherboards and the like-for-like cladding of $44,336 is accepted and accordingly the estimated cost of repairs, exclusive of Council fees and other specialists’ costs, is established to the sum of $206,843. In relation to professional fees and supervision the only other dispute related to the supervision of the repair work. The claimants however conceded in closing s...
RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E Supplementary Analysis Report: Criminal Activity Intervention Legislation Bill Coversheet Purpose of Document Decision sought: Advising agencies: Proposing Ministers: Date finalised: Problem Definition This analysis was produced for the purpose of informing final Cabinet decisions on an omnibus Bill to enhance enforcement tools to disrupt and prosecute gang conflict and harm. Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police
RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E Supplementary Analysis Report: Criminal Activity Intervention Legislation Bill Coversheet Purpose of Document Decision sought: Advising agencies: Proposing Ministers: Date finalised: Problem Definition This analysis was produced for the purpose of informing final Cabinet decisions on an omnibus Bill to enhance enforcement tools to disrupt and prosecute gang conflict and harm. Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police
...bring the profession into disrepute associated with the respondents locking him out of the firm’s premises and systems, the Committee’s relevant findings were that: (a) the lockout was a consequence of the expulsion; (b) its legality was a civil matter; (c) the arbitrator had ruled that the respondents had valid grounds to expel the applicant;8 (d) the lockout was neither unprofessional nor disrespectful nor discourteous. Complaint 7: Improper threats [74] In relation to th...
LCRO 240/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HM Applicant AND NL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr HM has applied to review a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X], in which the Comm
...practitioners”. [d] Only three months after that finding there was a further finding of unsatisfactory conduct in the form of conduct unbecoming for overcharging. In respect of both of these 2010 matters Mr Hart was ordered to refund portions of his fees to the respective clients. In respect of both matters Mr Hart exercised his right to review by the Legal Complaints Review Officer (“LCRO”) and, again, in respect of both matters, the findings as to overcharging were uphe...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 110 Ref: LCRO 95/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HC Applicant AND RB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, M
...licensee was not aware of, and gave the complainants no advice about, the restrictive covenant. [12] After purchasing the property and realising that they would not be able to use it as a wedding venue as they had intended, the complainants brought a civil claim against the vendors, the licensee's agency (CD Realty (HB Ltd (Bayleys))) and their own solicitors. The claim was ultimately discontinued, without prejudice to the complainants' ability to complain to the Real Estate...