4427 items matching your search terms
1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ALL INFORMATION RELATING TO PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 7 Reference No. HRRT 047/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KIM DOTCOM Plaintiff AND CROWN LAW OFFICE First Defendant CONT. AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG
Victim-led alternative resolution pathways Research Report August 2022 Elaine Mossman Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. i Part A – Critical review of relevant literature ......................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction .......................................................
LCRO 105/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SW Applicant AND NL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms SW has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee)
...work by giving attention first to those clients who were up to date and only thereafter did he deal with clients in arrears. Ms Powell 5 and Mr Moodie fell into the latter category. In addition, throughout 2008 he was trying to catch up on fees as he was facing considerable financial pressure. His recollection is that his response to the letter of 19 August 2008 “was only a couple of phone calls”. He concedes that it was not an immediate response. In addition Mr Hamilton sa...
...Payments to Firms 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 The payments to firms are for legal services provided by approved providers under the legal aid schemes and may not have been made directly to any individual named in this report. The payments include the fees of approved providers, including those claimed on behalf of other approved providers, and disbursements for general office costs, travel costs, and special disbursements, which include fees for agents, expert witnesses, forensic tes...
...Payments to Firms 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 The payments to firms are for legal services provided by approved providers under the legal aid schemes and may not have been made directly to any individual named in this report. The payments include the fees of approved providers, including those claimed on behalf of other approved providers, and disbursements for general office costs, travel costs, and special disbursements, which include fees for agents, expert witnesses, forensic tests, in...
...Payments to Firms 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018 The payments to firms are for legal services provided by approved providers under the legal aid schemes and may not have been made directly to any individual named in this report. The payments include the fees of approved providers, including those claimed on behalf of other approved providers, and disbursements for general office costs, travel costs, and special disbursements, which include fees for agents, expert witnesses, forensic tests...
RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT lIB HAWKE'S BAY DEAN COWIE SEPTEMBER 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District l1A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 12: The Wellington District, Dr R Anderson and K Pickens District 13: The Nor
Family Justice An Administrative Review of Family Justice System Reforms Published by the Ministry of Justice Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the i
Minute Book: 165 AOT 131 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: Counsel: Judgment: Introduction A20050012905 A20050012904 UNDER Sections 135 and 310 ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ohiro 19 & 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) BETWEEN MAORI TRUSTEE Applicant AND 21, 22, 23 November 2005 (Heard at Wellington) STEPHEN HANFORD RUSSELL RODGERS Respondents Mr G Shaw and Mr H Wilson for the Applicant Mr T Bennion and Ms C Castle