Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 1 Northern South Island [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON JUNE 1995 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District I: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District IIA: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith THE AUTHOR My name is Grant Phillipson and I completed a B.A. Hons. in histo

2. Proactive release - Evidence to inform a regulated cannabis market [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   BERL REPORTS MINISTRY OF JUSTICE DISCLAIMER 1. This report was prepared by Business and Economic Research Limited (BERL), under commission from the Ministry of Justice. 2. The views, opinions, recommendations, and advice expressed in this report belong solely to the authors of the report. The views do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of Justice or the New Zealand Government. 3. The report was one of a number of inputs considered by the Ministry in the dev

3. Nukutere Lands Trust v Trustees of Whitikau A1 – Opape 28 (2013) 70 Waiariki MB 272 (70 WAR 272) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...the Whitikau A1 trustees with advice in 2005. He added little new information regarding the surveys, other than information obtained from the Ōpōtiki District Council. He was advised that as the OMR is considered to be a public road, consent fees may not be high as estimated by Mr Yetsenga. Harrison Grierson Consultants; were commissioned to undertake an independent investigation into the two southern entry options for accessing Opape 28 – the Parkinson’s Track – Option 1...

4. Auckland District Law Society v Dorbu [2010] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...undermined the dignity of the Judiciary. Background The Barge Litigation [6] This litigation arose out of a complex set of commercial transactions in which the practitioner was integrally involved. These transactions were the subject of civil litigation which came before His Honour Priestley J over a lengthy period in February and March 2005. His Honour’s reserved judgment was released on 27 October 2005 and clear and decisive factual findings were made (CIV-2002-404-1771,...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [pdf, 431 KB]

   ...him for fuel according to the rate set by the IRD. The 42 This position description was presumably superseded to some degree when Pastor Chen became senior pastor after Pastor Zhou left. Church also agreed to reimburse him for any fees associated with theological training or working out of town or overseas. [92] The Agreement’s leave arrangements are set out in some detail. Pastor Chen agreed to work on public holidays, and the Agreement indicated that the holiday p...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 221 Cronin-Lampe v The Board of Trustees of Melville High School [pdf, 1 MB]

   KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MELVILLE HIGH SCHOOL [2023] NZEmpC 221 [5 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 221 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND

7. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of form submissions [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...other activities 47 If you answered 'yes', how could we best do this to avoid any obligations being duplicated for the same activity? Please share your comments below. 47 Question 2.8: Should we clarify what is meant by 'professional fees'? 47 Clarify what is meant by professional fees 47 If you answered 'yes', what would be an appropriate definition? Please share your comments below. 47 Question 2.9: Should the fees of a third party be included within the s...

8. AML/CFT Statutory Review - summary of submissions [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Review of the AML/CFT Act Summary of submissions Ministry of Justice March 2022 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be constr

9. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v Clarkson [2012] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...costs up to the time the possibility of complete withdrawal of all charges, subsequent to a successful completion of all outstanding matters by Ms Clarkson, was considered. No further costs accrued against the Standards Committee, in respect of fees incurred after it decided to proceed with amended charges, were in fact being sought from Ms Clarkson counsel for the Committee advised. [47] In those circumstances Ms Clarkson’s concern about costs being unduly increased because o...

10. COVID-19 Response (Further Management Measures) Legislation Bill – Ministry of Justice [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...usually interpreted to entail physical presence, is considered a fundamental safeguard against unfairness or error in court proceedings. The right is reflected in a number of the specific criminal procedure protections of the NZBORA. In civil proceedings, it arises as an incident of the right to natural justice affirmed by s 27(1). It is not yet settled whether the criminal procedure protections apply in the context of prison disciplinary proceedings in New Zealand, but the right...